82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Enjoy the uncalled-for cognitive dissonance in that the {{eqderiv}} definitions define {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} — in a rather airy way — even though “{{isdaprov|Transaction}}” is already defined in the {{isdama}}, in an equally airy way. | Enjoy the uncalled-for cognitive dissonance in that the {{eqderiv}} definitions define {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} — in a rather airy way — even though “{{isdaprov|Transaction}}” is already defined in the {{isdama}}, in an equally airy way. | ||
{{ | {{underlier}} | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*{{isdaprov|Transaction}} ({{isdama}}) | *{{isdaprov|Transaction}} ({{isdama}}) |