And/or: Difference between revisions

10 bytes added ,  11 October 2019
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Andor.png|thumb|right|500px|for extra cosmological points, try the preferred EU formulation.]]
{{a|plainenglish|[[File:Andor.png|thumb|right|500px|for extra cosmological points, try the preferred EU formulation.]]}}
===In brief===
===In brief===
In a {{nutshell}}, “{{f|and/or}}” means “{{f|or}}”, because “{{f|or}}” includes “{{f|and}}”.
In a {{nutshell}}, “{{f|and/or}}” means “{{f|or}}”, because “{{f|or}}” includes “{{f|and}}”.
Line 11: Line 11:
There is no grounds for this fear. Logically, this is how one defines {{f|and}} and {{f|or}}:
There is no grounds for this fear. Logically, this is how one defines {{f|and}} and {{f|or}}:


{{box|
:{{and}}  
*{{and}}  
:{{or}}
*{{or}}
 
}}


And/or is not just ugly; it’s defeatist, because of the presence of the [[virgule]], that whoreson {{tag|slash}}, which is not even a part of idiomatic punctuation in the English language. It’s a decoration. It has no fixed grammatical meaning. That slash admits that the plain, punctuated words of the English language have defeated you.
And/or is not just ugly; it’s defeatist, because of the presence of the [[virgule]], that whoreson {{tag|slash}}, which is not even a part of idiomatic punctuation in the English language. It’s a decoration. It has no fixed grammatical meaning. That slash admits that the plain, punctuated words of the English language have defeated you.