(If any): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A two-word motif that, as much as any other, belies an [[Mediocre lawyer|attorney]]’s deep existential fear of his own language. It speaks of a nervousness that, should a dependent clause bite on something that isn’t there, somehow the whole linguistic edifice will come crashing down; en edifice that can yet miraculously be affixed to the firmament with this single wipe of the [[mediocre lawyer|attorney]]’s {{tag|flannel}}.
{{pe}}A two-word motif that, as much as any other, belies an [[Mediocre lawyer|attorney]]’s deep existential fear of his own language. It speaks of a nervousness that, should a dependent clause bite on something that isn’t there, somehow the whole linguistic edifice will come crashing down; en edifice that can yet miraculously be affixed to the firmament with this single wipe of the [[mediocre lawyer|attorney]]’s {{tag|flannel}}.


{{plain|each {{csaprov|Other CSA}}, [[if any]],|''any'' {{csaprov|Other CSA}}}}
{{plain|each {{csaprov|Other CSA}}, [[if any]],|''any'' {{csaprov|Other CSA}}}}
Line 12: Line 12:
Also, like “[[or any part thereof]]”, a neat exclamation point if you want to get the last word in a round of “who’s the most anal lawyer” in the negotiation. Appending that, sole, comment to a sheaf of 5.5pt font and faxing it back an hour before the deal is due to close entitles one to a swept-back wing knee slide.
Also, like “[[or any part thereof]]”, a neat exclamation point if you want to get the last word in a round of “who’s the most anal lawyer” in the negotiation. Appending that, sole, comment to a sheaf of 5.5pt font and faxing it back an hour before the deal is due to close entitles one to a swept-back wing knee slide.


{{seealso}}
{{sa}}
*[[Or any part thereof]]
*[[Or any part thereof]]
*[[Entire agreement]]
*[[Entire agreement]]
*[[Counterparts]]
*[[Counterparts]]