82,903
edits
Template:Isda architecture: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*the all-but-retired-but-don’t-forget-there-are-still-soldiers-in-the-Burmese-jungle '''{{1987ma}}'''<ref>Seriously: proceed with cuation with one of these. {{1987ma}}s don’t have a lot of safety features a modern derivatives counterparty relies on, so only for real specialists and weirdos. Think of it like flying a spitfire rather than a 737 Max. Um, okay, bad {{t|metaphor}}.</ref> | *the all-but-retired-but-don’t-forget-there-are-still-soldiers-in-the-Burmese-jungle '''{{1987ma}}'''<ref>Seriously: proceed with cuation with one of these. {{1987ma}}s don’t have a lot of safety features a modern derivatives counterparty relies on, so only for real specialists and weirdos. Think of it like flying a spitfire rather than a 737 Max. Um, okay, bad {{t|metaphor}}.</ref> | ||
*there ''isn’t'' a '''{{2008ma}}'''. That’s a little running [[JC]] in-joke.<ref>Talking to yourself might not be the first sign of madness, but having ''in-jokes'' with yourself might be.</ref> | *there ''isn’t'' a '''{{2008ma}}'''. That’s a little running [[JC]] in-joke.<ref>Talking to yourself might not be the first sign of madness, but having ''in-jokes'' with yourself might be.</ref> | ||
All three versions have a tri-partite form: '''Pre-printed Master''', '''{{isdaprov|Schedule}}''' and — well this is controversial, for is it, or is it not, part of the {{isdama}}? — '''{{isdaprov|Credit | All three versions have a tri-partite form: '''Pre-printed Master''', '''{{isdaprov|Schedule}}''' and — well this is controversial, for is it, or is it not, part of the {{isdama}}? — '''{{isdaprov|Credit Support Annex}}'''. | ||
====Pre-printed master==== | ====Pre-printed master==== | ||
The first part of the trinity is the pre-printed form of {{isdama}}. | The first part of the trinity is the pre-printed form of {{isdama}}. | ||