82,889
edits
Technological unemployment: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|tech|[[File:BS bingo.png|450px|frame|center|This graphic courtesy of the JC’s own spurious correlations research programme]]}}One of the great {{t|dogma}}s. | {{a|tech|[[File:BS bingo.png|450px|frame|center|This graphic courtesy of the JC’s own spurious correlations research programme]]}}One of the great {{t|dogma}}s. | ||
As articulated by Keynes: “unemployment due to our discovery of means of economising the use of labour outrunning the pace at which we can find new uses for labour.”<ref>Keynes: ''Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren''</ref>. It is fairly obvious that this can only ever be a temporary effect: the possibilities by freeing labour up from one occupation to do anything else must mean in the long run there can be no technological unemployment. | As articulated by Keynes: “unemployment due to our discovery of means of economising the use of labour outrunning the pace at which we can find new uses for labour.”<ref>Keynes: ''Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren''</ref>. It is fairly obvious that this can only ever be a temporary effect: the possibilities by freeing labour up from one occupation to do anything else must mean in the long run ''there can be no technological unemployment''. But — just try telling that to {{author|Daniel Susskind}}.<ref>We say to him what we [[The Singularity is Near - Book Review|said a decade]] ago to {{author|Ray Kurzweil}}: “... it’s easy to be smug as I type on my decidedly physical computer, showing no signs of being superseded with VR Goggles just yet and we’re only six months from the new decade, [''note: that was the '''last''' decade.''] but, being as path-dependent as it is the evolutionary process is notoriously bad at making predictions — until the results are in.”</ref> | ||
To our simplistic way of looking at it, to believe the contrary is to be afflicted by, at least, a lack of imagination — and really, a lack of ''wisdom'' — the kind you can only get from the school of ''life''. There is more than one way to skin a cat, and they way which is how you are doing them now. The whole edifice of technological development is founded on that being utterly wrong: Did Apple, when they invented the iPhone, anticipate all the applications to which it could be put? has the iPhone destroyed, or created, commercial activity? | |||
Indeed technology threatens those who seek to [[operationalise]] labour - taking the easy, algorithmic bits, that could - and really, (if [[reg tech]] was any good, ''already should'' be done by robots. | Indeed technology threatens those who seek to [[operationalise]] labour - taking the easy, algorithmic bits, that could - and really, (if [[reg tech]] was any good, ''already should'' be done by robots. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
There is an equilibrium of sorts between the need to get stuff done and the need to vent your own opinions, and until that [[Tim Berners-Lee|Berners-Lee]] fellow ruined everything, it was set quite delicately at a place where, for most of us, while achieving anything was hard, finding people to listen to your opinions was even harder, so we spent most of our time in morose silence slugging away at a hard rock-face with an old, soft-bristled, toothbrush. We had collected enough chips of slate to keep our employers happy and take a bit home to keep the hungry mouths around the Formica table passably filled with tinned foods. The only people around to hear our plaintive discursions about the ills of the modern world were those spouses and children, their mouths so crammed with baked beans as to be unable even to reply. The divorce rate was stratospheric. | There is an equilibrium of sorts between the need to get stuff done and the need to vent your own opinions, and until that [[Tim Berners-Lee|Berners-Lee]] fellow ruined everything, it was set quite delicately at a place where, for most of us, while achieving anything was hard, finding people to listen to your opinions was even harder, so we spent most of our time in morose silence slugging away at a hard rock-face with an old, soft-bristled, toothbrush. We had collected enough chips of slate to keep our employers happy and take a bit home to keep the hungry mouths around the Formica table passably filled with tinned foods. The only people around to hear our plaintive discursions about the ills of the modern world were those spouses and children, their mouths so crammed with baked beans as to be unable even to reply. The divorce rate was stratospheric. | ||
[[File:Internet vs divorce.png| | [[File:Internet vs divorce.png|300px|frame|left|A happy compromise, yesterday.]]Enter the internet, distributed [[network]]s, are tools are sharper but suddenly ''talk is cheap''. As such, you get what you pay for: a lot of cheap talk fills up the workplace. If we haven’t enough of this quadrophonic noise by the time we come to clock out, we can vent the remains of our metaphysical angst into the howling, stone-deaf gale that is the [[world wide web]], rather the well-bent ears of our long-suffering spouses and their bean-stuffed toe-rags. We sit at our tele-screens and watch our rage boil off, evaporating harmlessly into the infinite, thundering dark. | ||
I’m getting a bit carried away, aren’t I. But not entirely: see left for what Google’s ngram viewer makes of the relationship between marital harmony and a fulfilled online life. But while [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_and_Bill%27s_law Andy (and his successors) have been givething, it is not just Bill who has been takething away]. The [[middle management]] layer has been doing its bit too, by — well, basically by ''inventing'' itself to occupy the space occupied by the crickets. And it we take it that the productivity tools came on line from the mid 1980s — personal computers, the [[fax]], [[e-mail]] and then this glorious thing called the [[world wide web]]. | I’m getting a bit carried away, aren’t I. But not entirely: see left for what Google’s ngram viewer makes of the relationship between marital harmony and a fulfilled online life. But while [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_and_Bill%27s_law Andy (and his successors) have been givething, it is not just Bill who has been takething away]. The [[middle management]] layer has been doing its bit too, by — well, basically by ''inventing'' itself to occupy the space occupied by the crickets. And it we take it that the productivity tools came on line from the mid 1980s — personal computers, the [[fax]], [[e-mail]] and then this glorious thing called the [[world wide web]]. | ||