No consequential loss - GMSLA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{gmslaanat|10.4}}
{{Manual|MSG|2010|10.4|Clause|10.3|medium}}
There’s a lovely long essay about [[consequential loss]], at the [[consequential loss]] page. Consequential losses are not generally available as a measure of [[damages]] under a {{t|contract}} (historically they were excluded as a rule; nowadays the [[common law]] regard it as a simple question of whether the [[loss]] was properly [[Causation|caused]] and [[reasonably foreseeable]]; losses that are consequential in nature may be forseeable, but it will only be in unusual circumstances.
There’s a lovely long essay about [[consequential loss]], at the [[consequential loss]] page. Consequential losses are not generally available as a measure of [[damages]] under a {{t|contract}} (historically they were excluded as a rule; nowadays the [[common law]] regard it as a simple question of whether the [[loss]] was properly [[Causation|caused]] and [[reasonably foreseeable]]; losses that are consequential in nature may be forseeable, but it will only be in unusual circumstances.