Seventh law of worker entropy: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
}}{{seventh law of worker entropy}}
}}{{seventh law of worker entropy}}


In support of the theory, we cite {{author|Peter Thiel}} — who has had the odd small success with tech innovation — whose operating assumption when considering whether to invest is that, to displace competitors and have a reasonable chance of success, a tech product should be ''an order of magnitude'' better than its competitors. Not just a ''bit'' better, but ''ten times'' better.<ref>{{br|Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future}}, {{author|Peter Thiel}}</ref>
In support of the theory, we cite {{author|Peter Thiel}} — who has had the odd small success starting up (and, er, shutting down) innovative internet businesses — whose operating assumption when considering an investment is that to see off competition and have a reasonable chance of success, a tech product should be ''an order of magnitude'' better than its competitors. Not just a ''bit'' better, but ''ten times'' better.<ref>{{br|Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future}}, {{author|Peter Thiel}}</ref>


If you want to change how people do things, ''make life easier for them''. Not ''harder''. Any innovation that, for example, injects a new [[dialog box]], however well-intended — was there ever a [[dialog box]] that ''wasn’t'' well-intended? — into an existing process makes life harder, however exciting the prospect of enhanced MIS that comes from having the [[user]]s repetitively click it may be.
If you want to change how people do things, ''make life easier for them''. Not ''harder''. Any innovation that, for example, injects a new [[dialog box]], however well-intended — was there ever a [[dialog box]] that ''wasn’t'' well-intended? — into an existing process makes life harder, however exciting the prospect of enhanced MIS that comes from having the [[user]]s repetitively click it may be.