82,891
edits
Legal services delivery: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:''“More recently the buzz and effort has shifted from innovation in legal expertise (inventing [[derivatives]], [[CDO]]s and so on) to how the services that embed that expertise are delivered.”'' | :''“More recently the buzz and effort has shifted from innovation in legal expertise (inventing [[derivatives]], [[CDO]]s and so on) to how the services that embed that expertise are delivered.”'' | ||
The learned authors seem to recognise that | The learned authors seem to recognise that legal work involving sophisticated real-time reaction to emerging legal quandaries, is (or, in the good old days, ''was'') less ''mune'' to the “march of the [[chatbot]]s” — [[A&O]] raked a fair few millions cranking out [[CDO]]s, after all — but their insight, wholly unrecognisable though it may be, to those us at the coalface, is that ''it’s all changed now''. [[This time is different]]. | ||
It’s like we’ve somehow solved the game; that there are no mysteries left: one can only now create “legal worth” by supersizing, adding fries, or getting the delivery guy to go faster for less money. ''It’s not about the [[pizza]]''. | |||
===It ''is'' about the [[pizza]].=== | ===It ''is'' about the [[pizza]].=== | ||
| Line 40: | Line 42: | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[This time is different]] | |||
*[[School-leaver from Bucharest]] | *[[School-leaver from Bucharest]] | ||
*[[Why is reg tech so disappointing?]] | *[[Why is reg tech so disappointing?]] | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||