Seven wastes of negotiation: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
The reasons for this are as obvious as they are routinely ignored: projects, priorities, processes and people change, and the [[path of least resistance]] is to layer a new process over an old one. That kind of short-termism is exactly the environment that created the baffling complexity, redundancy and waste in the first place: [[barnacles]] quickly accrete unless your people are permanently committed to process excellence. Train your staff to be constant gardeners, and you won’t need periodic visits from McKinsey to dig you out of holes.
The reasons for this are as obvious as they are routinely ignored: projects, priorities, processes and people change, and the [[path of least resistance]] is to layer a new process over an old one. That kind of short-termism is exactly the environment that created the baffling complexity, redundancy and waste in the first place: [[barnacles]] quickly accrete unless your people are permanently committed to process excellence. Train your staff to be constant gardeners, and you won’t need periodic visits from McKinsey to dig you out of holes.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
* [[Innovation]] and the [[innovation paradox]]
*[[A faster horse - technology article]]
*[[A faster horse - technology article]]
*{{wasteprov|Cost}}
*{{wasteprov|Cost}}
{{ref}}
{{ref}}
{{skunkworks}}
{{skunkworks}}