82,882
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
1. (''Vogue usage'') [[Information technology]] that assists in the provision of or, more likely, ''[[Legal services delivery|delivery]]'' of, legal services. In these pages used interchangeably with “[[reg tech]]”. Both quite disappointing. | 1. (''Vogue usage'') [[Information technology]] that assists in the provision of or, more likely, ''[[Legal services delivery|delivery]]'' of, legal services. In these pages used interchangeably with “[[reg tech]]”. Both quite disappointing. | ||
2. (''Contrarian usage'') ''Not'' [[chat-bot]]s, {{t|AI}}, [[metadata extraction]], fuzzy logic or [[semantic syntactical parsing|reg tech]] | 2. (''Contrarian usage'') ''Not'' [[chat-bot]]s, {{t|AI}}, [[metadata extraction]], fuzzy logic or [[semantic syntactical parsing|reg tech]] or [[blockchain]]. Instead, the [[Code: Version 2.0|code]] that lawyers are trained in how to programme from their first day at law school: '''[[words]]'''. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
* | *[[A faster horse]] | ||
*{{br|Code: Version 2.0}} | *{{br|Code: Version 2.0}} | ||
*[[Plain English]] | *[[Plain English]] | ||
*[[Why is reg tech so disappointing?]] | *[[Why is reg tech so disappointing?]] | ||
*[[Software as a service]] | *[[Software as a service]] |