82,891
edits
Constructive: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
But, like a [[Ferae naturae|bitey wild animal]], or an [[Rylands v Fletcher - Case Note|ordinarily docile, if unkempt, reservoir]], the concept can flood its bulwarks. So the unwilling student assures his enquiring mother that he has ''constructively'' done his homework. Well, I sure did. | But, like a [[Ferae naturae|bitey wild animal]], or an [[Rylands v Fletcher - Case Note|ordinarily docile, if unkempt, reservoir]], the concept can flood its bulwarks. So the unwilling student assures his enquiring mother that he has ''constructively'' done his homework. Well, I sure did. | ||
The constructiveness of notice got a bit of an airing, albeit [[obiter dicta]] in that Hannibal Lecter of a decision in {{casenote|Citigroup|Brigade Capital Management}} | The constructiveness of notice got a bit of an airing, albeit [[obiter dicta]] in that Hannibal Lecter of a decision in {{casenote|Citigroup|Brigade Capital Management}}. In New York law “it means a person either knows or has reason to know” the fact in question; “reason to know” including “other facts known to the person would make it reasonable to infer the existence of the fact, or prudent to conduct further equity that would reveal it.” | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||