Banque Worms v BankAmerica International: Difference between revisions

Banque Worms v BankAmerica International (view source)

64 bytes added , 18 February 2021

no edit summary

82,891

edits

Revision as of 18:57, 18 February 2021 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:59, 18 February 2021 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{a\|casenote\|{{citer\|Banque Worms\|BankAmerica International\|2d Cir. 1991\|928 F.2d 538}}~~[[File:Can of Banque Worms.png\|450px\|thumb\|center\|A~~ can of Banque Worms yesterday. ~~(The decision, not the Banque, obviously)~~]]}}This case, fondly known to [[restitution]] fans and other obstreperous rascals of the financial services industry as ''[[Banque Worms]]'' involved a [[revolving credit facility]] between one Spedley and the Banque.		{{a\|casenote\|[[File:Can of Banque Worms.png\|450px\|thumb\|center\|{{citer\|Banque Worms\|BankAmerica International\|2d Cir. 1991\|928 F.2d 538}} opening a can of Banque Worms yesterday.]]}}This case, fondly known to [[restitution]] fans and other obstreperous rascals of the financial services industry as ''[[Banque Worms]]'' involved a [[revolving credit facility]] between one Spedley, an Australian, and the Banque, who was, then, French.<Ref>And seems to have dissolved into history since.</ref>

	===Facts===		===Facts===