82,885
edits
Banque Worms v BankAmerica International: Difference between revisions
Banque Worms v BankAmerica International (view source)
Revision as of 18:30, 20 February 2021
, 20 February 2021no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|casenote|[[File:Can of Banque Worms.png|450px|thumb|center|{{citer|Banque Worms|BankAmerica International|2d Cir. 1991|928 F.2d|538}} opening a can of [[Banque Worms]] yesterday.]]}}This case, fondly known to [[restitution]] fans and other obstreperous rascals of the financial services industry as ''[[Banque Worms]]'' involved a [[revolving credit facility]] between one Spedley, an Australian, and the Banque, who was, then, French.<Ref>And seems to have dissolved into history since.</ref> | {{a|casenote|[[File:Can of Banque Worms.png|450px|thumb|center|{{citer|Banque Worms|BankAmerica International|2d Cir. 1991|928 F.2d|538}} opening a can of [[Banque Worms]] yesterday.]]}}This case, fondly known to [[restitution]] fans and other obstreperous rascals of the financial services industry as ''[[Banque Worms]]'' involved a [[revolving credit facility]] between one Spedley, an Australian, and the Banque, who was, then, French.<Ref>And seems to have dissolved into history since.</ref> | ||
===Facts=== | ===Facts=== | ||
In 1989, [[Banque Worms]] informed Spedley that it would not be renewing the [[revolver]] and demanded payment of the outstanding balance on April 10, 1989. | In 1989, [[Banque Worms]] informed Spedley that it would not be renewing the [[revolver]] and demanded payment of the outstanding balance on April 10, 1989. | ||
| Line 36: | Line 35: | ||
*{{casenote|Barclays Bank Ltd|WJ Simms}} | *{{casenote|Barclays Bank Ltd|WJ Simms}} | ||
{{Ref}} | {{Ref}} | ||
{{c|Stupid bankers}} | |||