Modernism: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
Modernism’s heyday was 1914-1945 — you don’t need to be a history buff to clock those two dates — and its track record was — well, a bit underwhelming: one machine age, two hot world wars, a cold one, two political ideologies that murdered a hundred million people between them, and if that wasn’t enough, an enormous, decade-long recession as well.
Modernism’s heyday was 1914-1945 — you don’t need to be a history buff to clock those two dates — and its track record was — well, a bit underwhelming: one machine age, two hot world wars, a cold one, two political ideologies that murdered a hundred million people between them, and if that wasn’t enough, an enormous, decade-long recession as well.


So you would like to think that Modernism has had its day, but no. After the second world war there was a period of [[high-modernism]] — outside the Communist states, not so murderous, but repressive all the same — and even when that waned in the 1980s, the promise of the [[information revolution]] ushered in a new wave. Perhaps our computational machines weren’t powerful enough! Perhaps ''now'' we can solve all the worlds problem’s with data. And so it has transpired: over the last thirty years there has been an [[information revolution]], a (re)birth of ''digital'' modernism. In Web 1.0 you could buy books online. In Web 2.0 you could complain about the books you bought online. Web 3.0 you could like it when other people complained about the books they bought online. Web 4.0: [[LinkedIn]]’s [[chatbot]]s do it all for you.  
So you would like to think that Modernism has had its day, but no. After the second world war there was a period of [[high-modernism]] — outside the Communist states, not so murderous, but repressive all the same — and even when that waned in the 1980s, the promise of the [[information revolution]] ushered in a new wave. Perhaps our computational machines weren’t powerful enough! Perhaps ''now'' we can solve all the worlds problem’s with data. And so it has transpired: over the last thirty years there has been an [[information revolution]], a (re)birth of ''digital'' modernism.  


Welcome to 2021: every gormless teen on the planet has enough computing power in his pocket to land a rocket on the moon, and yet here we still are.
In Web 1.0 you could buy books online.  


Modernism is profoundly [[determinist]], [[rationalist]], assumes the world is therefore a static place which even the hardest problems can be solved — that machines can be built that can divine the answers to questions our mortal minds cannot handle, and in that sense is in equal parts utopian, delusional and ''lazy'': it believes that difficult stuff can all be solved without upsetting the dynamics of the system, and once solved we will all live happily ever after.
In Web 2.0 you could complain about the books you bought online.
 
In Web 3.0 you could like it when other people complained about the books they bought online.
 
In Web 4.0: [[LinkedIn]]’s [[chatbot]]s do it all for you, and wish you a “happy work-i-versary!”.
 
Welcome to 2021: every gormless teen on the planet’s face carries enough processing power to land a rocket on the moon, and yet here we still are.
 
Modernism is profoundly [[determinist]], [[rationalist]], assumes the world is therefore a static place which even the hardest problems can be solved — that machines can be built that can divine the answers to questions our (gormless) mortal minds cannot handle, and in that sense is in equal parts utopian, delusional and ''lazy'': it believes that difficult stuff can all be solved without upsetting the dynamics of the system, and once solved we will all live happily ever after.


*Quick
*Quick