Butterfly effect: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
To the contrary, it is to make the opposite point: these “systems are so [[complex]] there’s absolutely no chance of predicting how they will behave.”
To the contrary, it is to make the opposite point: these “systems are so [[complex]] there’s absolutely no chance of predicting how they will behave.”


Butterfly wing-flaps are discrete independent events. One butterfly flapping its wings will not make more or less likely another butterfly’s decision to do the same, let alone any of the other environmental factors that might cause a tropical storm.  
Butterfly wing-flaps are discrete independent events. Unless you are prepared to hypothesise some kind of spooky quantum butterfly entanglement, one butterfly flapping its wings will not make more or less likely another butterfly’s decision to do the same, let alone any of the other environmental factors that might cause a tropical storm.  


Furthermore, there are millions of butterflies in the Amazon, all discretely wing flapping, and [[Gaussian]] nature of these events will largely cancel each other out, putting butterfly wing flapping in “Mediocristan” and not “Extremistan”.
Furthermore, there are millions of butterflies in the Amazon, all discretely wing flapping, and [[Gaussian]] nature of these events will largely cancel each other out, putting butterfly wing flapping in “Mediocristan” and not “Extremistan”.