Eagle squad: Difference between revisions

Eagle squad (view source)

Revision as of 18:06, 19 July 2021

1,010 bytes added , 19 July 2021

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,891

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===Education/advocacy===
-*Systems for good (meadows) and bad (gall)
+====Organisational theory generally====
-*The role of legal
+[[Systems analysis]]:
+*For good: [[Systems theory]] — [[Donella H. Meadows]]
+*For bad: [[Systemantics: The Systems Bible]] — {{Author|John Gall}}
+Solving the future: a philosophical battle between:
+*[[Reductionism]]: We can solve the future by policy/taxonomy/data/tech:
+*[[Pragmatism]]: We cannot predict emerging risks — we need flexibility and expertise to make risk decisions out in the view we can manage every risk by policy.
+*A mixed approach required: Make BAU as standardised, preengingeered cheap and no-nonsense as possible; leave the frontiers as clear and flexible as possible.
+:*BAU: [[Toyota Production System]]
+:*Frontier: [[Normal accident]]s
+Approaches which get this wrong: anything which obliges humans to rekey, fill out forms, attest, certify as to BAU: this is should be automated
+*[[Reg tech]] which tries to do the hard stuff and requires humans to do the clerical stuff: which forces humans to be form-filler-outers
+*[[Policy]] as a problem: if you codify get machines to do it. If you need humans to do it, you need to keep the rules simple and clear.
+===The role of legal===
+*Not part of the operational stack
 **The two modes of legal: ''farming'' and ''building a frontier''
 **Farming: Toyota production system
 **Frontier: normal accidents
 **The line betwixt: ''triage''
-*Philosophical battle of reductionism versus pragmatism. Plays out in the view we can manage every risk by policy.
 *Commitment signalling: understanding the psychology of negotiation
 **Getting *their* business onside, and reframing the debate between their business and their legal