83,022
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|philosophy|}}A rule of thumb, attributed to 12th century Franciscan friar William of Occam, that recommends when being presented with competing hypotheses about the same p...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
That said, Occam’s razor is no principle of logic, but a convenient [[heuristic]]. There are plenty of examples where Occam would prefer the wrong explanation: Newton’s laws of motion, for example, do not require contorting the geometry of spacetime to the point where time is a variable and the speed of light constant, despite there being almost no hard evidence for it, but they have still been superseded by Einstein’s, which do. | That said, Occam’s razor is no principle of logic, but a convenient [[heuristic]]. There are plenty of examples where Occam would prefer the wrong explanation: Newton’s laws of motion, for example, do not require contorting the geometry of spacetime to the point where time is a variable and the speed of light constant, despite there being almost no hard evidence for it, but they have still been superseded by Einstein’s, which do. | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Science]] | |||
*[[Philosophy of science]] | |||
*{{c|cosmology}} |