82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The regulators replied, “well, if you can’t explain the big picture risks in a single page, the product can’t be suitable for the general public, can it?” | The regulators replied, “well, if you can’t explain the big picture risks in a single page, the product can’t be suitable for the general public, can it?” | ||
{{quote| | |||
{{quote|“Can we cross reference to a full prospectus so —” <br> | “Can we cross-reference to a full prospectus so —” <br> | ||
“No.” <br> | “No.” <br> | ||
“But —” <br> | “But —” <br> | ||
“''No''.”}} | “''No''.”}} | ||
The legal community reluctantly demurred, but insisted on generating a hundred-page prospectus ''as well'', despite the transparently obvious fact that ''no-one, [[RESIDENTS OF NEW HAMPSHIRE|frequently not even the lawyers preparing it]]'', would ever read it. | The legal community reluctantly demurred, but for a time insisted on generating a hundred-page prospectus ''as well'', despite the transparently obvious fact that ''no-one, [[RESIDENTS OF NEW HAMPSHIRE|frequently not even the lawyers preparing it]]'', would ever read it. | ||
There is now a curious dissonance: retail investors — who are | There is now a curious dissonance: retail investors — who, remember, are congenitally clueless ingenues, unable to tie their shoelaces for all the grandchildren dandling on their knees — are given only a few hundred words to digest the catastrophic potential of [[packaged retail investment products]]. Institutional eurobond investors, on the other hand, who are bona fide accredited financial wizards, are presumed to not be capable of grasping the idea of a [[floating rate note]] without the help of three hundred pages of contorted, 9pt mush. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} |