82,891
edits
No waiver: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|boilerplate| | {{a|boilerplate| | ||
{{image|Wafer|png|Your kind are not welcome here, sunshine.}} | |||
}} | }}[[Waiver]] is a place where the laws of the New World and the Old diverge. | ||
[[Waiver]] is a place where the laws of the New World and the Old diverge. | |||
Does one really need a contractual provision dealing with the consequences of a fellow’s good-natured ''indulgence'' when carrying on commerce in the international markets? Just because I was kind enough to indulge you in not insisting on my strict legal rights, does the law punish me by taking away those rights for ever? Should I recorded for posterity that by granting such an accommodation I mean no waiver? Those with an English qualification and a stout constitution will snort, make reference to {{casenote|Hughes|Metropolitan Railway}} and say it is inconsequential fluff that goes without saying;<ref>Those with less fortitude will say, “well it does no harm, so let’s just put it in there, okay?”</ref> Americans, accustomed to the [[Uniform Commercial Code]] will tread more carefully, lest they create a relationship-altering “[[course of dealing]]”. | Does one really need a contractual provision dealing with the consequences of a fellow’s good-natured ''indulgence'' when carrying on commerce in the international markets? Just because I was kind enough to indulge you in not insisting on my strict legal rights, does the law punish me by taking away those rights for ever? Should I recorded for posterity that by granting such an accommodation I mean no waiver? Those with an English qualification and a stout constitution will snort, make reference to {{casenote|Hughes|Metropolitan Railway}} and say it is inconsequential fluff that goes without saying;<ref>Those with less fortitude will say, “well it does no harm, so let’s just put it in there, okay?”</ref> Americans, accustomed to the [[Uniform Commercial Code]] will tread more carefully, lest they create a relationship-altering “[[course of dealing]]”. | ||