To the fullest extent permissible by law: Difference between revisions

To the fullest extent permissible by law (view source)

7 bytes added , 15 November 2022

no edit summary

82,903

edits

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 “Okay, okay, I ''get'' it. You aren’t responsible. ''Jesus''. Calm ''down'' already.”
-Now, should it transpire that “the fullest extent of the law” did not allow the Issuer off a hook to which its gentler passages might have turned a blind eye — and we quite like the idea there are lazy stretches further down the legal river that aren’t as wet ’n’ wild as the far reaches of its fullest extent — but let’s just say: then for investors, happy days; they’re in the money, however blunt the Issuer has been in its disclaimer.  But in that case, what would the Issuer have gained by tempering its disclaimer with this “fullest extent” vacillation in the interim?
+Now, should it transpire that, for all the Issuer’s bluntest warnings the fullest extent of the law did not allow it off a hook to which the law’s gentler passages might have turned a blind eye — and we quite like the idea there are lazy stretches further down the legal river that aren’t as wet ’n’ wild as its far reaches —  then in that case, for investors, happy days; they’re in the money, however terse and to the point the Issuer has been in its disclaimer.  But what would the Issuer have gained by tempering its disclaimer with this “fullest extent” vacillation in any case?
 And ''not'' saying it hardly makes the Issuer’s position worse, does it?
 {{egg}}
 {{ref}}