Furniture: Difference between revisions

Furniture (view source)

Revision as of 15:29, 16 November 2022

164 bytes added , 16 November 2022

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,891

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{a|design|}}{{Quote|
 {{caps|'''[[Legal ops]]'''}}: We must innovate! We have earmarked technology budget to innovate! <br>
-{{caps|'''[[JC]]'''}}: Great! How about some decent document comparison software? Microsoft’s comparison engine is rubbish. <br>
+{{caps|'''[[JC]]'''}}: Great! How about some decent document comparison software? [[Microsoft]]’s comparison engine sucks. <br>
-{{caps|'''[[Legal ops]]'''}}: We can’t use our fuinds on that. <br>
+{{caps|'''[[Legal ops]]'''}}: We can’t use our funds on that. <br>
 {{caps|'''[[JC]]'''}}: Why not? <br>
-{{caps|'''[[Legal ops]]'''}}: Because it isn’t very innovative, is it? <br>
+{{caps|'''[[Legal ops]]'''}}: Because it isn’t very innovative? <br>
 {{caps|'''[[JC]]'''}}: Would it change your mind if I told you it runs on [[blockchain]]? <br>
 {{caps|'''[[Legal ops]]'''}}: YES! Does it? <br>
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 {{caps|'''[[JC]]'''}} and {{caps|'''Sofware Vendor'''}} ''(in unison)'': Nothing. <br>
 }}
-{{quote|Technology should be part of the everyday. We should see it and touch it and use it all the time.}}{{Author|Stewart Brand}} has a great expression for this kind of technology: the “invisible present”. The problem is that technology which does integrate seamlessly into our lives doesn’t look like technology for very long. Email. Web browsers. Smartphones. Wikipedia. Google
+{{Author|Stewart Brand}} has a great expression for the kind of technology that is so good, so effective, that you don’t really think of it as technology: the “invisible present”.
-It looks like *furniture*.
+Technology which does integrate seamlessly into our lives doesn’t ''look'' like technology for very long: ''email''. The Internet. Smartphones. Wikipedia. Google. We have moved on. We are looking at [[Neural network|neural networks]], [[AI]], [[distributed ledger]]s, permissionless, decentralised currency exchanges.
-Things that persistently look like technology, we call “bad technology”. O Paradox.
+It looks like ''furniture''.
+Things that persistently ''look'' like technology, we call “bad technology”.
+O Paradox.
+{{sa}}
+*[[Why is legaltech so disappointing]]