Furniture: Difference between revisions

24 bytes added ,  16 September 2023
no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
Line 5: Line 5:
{{caps|'''[[JC]]'''}}: Why not? <br>
{{caps|'''[[JC]]'''}}: Why not? <br>
{{caps|'''[[Legal ops]]'''}}: Because it isn’t very [[innovative]]? <br>
{{caps|'''[[Legal ops]]'''}}: Because it isn’t very [[innovative]]? <br>
{{caps|'''[[JC]]'''}}: But we don’t have it, though, do we? So it kind of ''would'' be an innovation?
{{caps|'''[[JC]]'''}}: But we don’t have it, though, do we? So it kind of ''would'' be an innovation? <br>
{{caps|'''[[Legal ops]]'''}}: Not [[innovative]]. <br>
{{caps|'''[[Legal ops]]'''}}: Not [[innovative]]. <br>
{{caps|'''[[JC]]'''}}: Would it change your mind if I told you it runs on [[blockchain]]? <br>
{{caps|'''[[JC]]'''}}: Would it change your mind if I told you it runs on [[blockchain]]? <br>
Line 19: Line 19:
{{d|Furniture|/ˈfɜːnɪʧə/|n|}}
{{d|Furniture|/ˈfɜːnɪʧə/|n|}}


[[Technology]] that, you know, does what it is meant to, effortlessly and without breaking, stopping or unexpectedly ruining other parts of your life, with such applomb that you forget it is technology at all. Part of the two part paradox: ''good'' technology is — ''not technology''.  
[[Technology]] that, you know, does what it is meant to, effortlessly and without breaking, stopping or unexpectedly ruining other parts of your life, with such aplomb that you forget it is technology at all.  
 
Part of the two-part [[paradox]]: ''good'' technology is — ''not technology''.  


===The Invisible present===
===The Invisible present===
Line 39: Line 41:
*[[Novelty fatigue]]
*[[Novelty fatigue]]
*[[Why is legaltech so disappointing]]
*[[Why is legaltech so disappointing]]
{{c|paradox}}