82,930
edits
Additional Termination Event - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Additional Termination Event - ISDA Provision (view source)
Revision as of 16:13, 19 November 2014
, 19 November 2014→Tricks for the Young Players
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
If, instead of being expressed as an “{{isdaprov|Additional Termination Event}}” under section {{isdaprov|5(b)(v)}}, which is how the ISDA Mechanism is intended to operate, it is set out as a new “{{isdaprov|5(b)(vi)}}” it is not designated therefore as any of an “{{isdaprov|Illegality}}”, “{{isdaprov|Tax Event}}”, “{{isdaprov|Tax Event Upon Merger}}”, “{{isdaprov|Credit Event Upon Merger}}” or “{{isdaprov|Additional Termination Event}}”, so therefore, read literally, is not caught by the definition of “{{isdaprov|Termination Event}}” and none of the Termination provisions bite on it. | If, instead of being expressed as an “{{isdaprov|Additional Termination Event}}” under section {{isdaprov|5(b)(v)}}, which is how the ISDA Mechanism is intended to operate, it is set out as a new “{{isdaprov|5(b)(vi)}}” it is not designated therefore as any of an “{{isdaprov|Illegality}}”, “{{isdaprov|Tax Event}}”, “{{isdaprov|Tax Event Upon Merger}}”, “{{isdaprov|Credit Event Upon Merger}}” or “{{isdaprov|Additional Termination Event}}”, so therefore, read literally, is not caught by the definition of “{{isdaprov|Termination Event}}” and none of the Termination provisions bite on it. | ||
I mention this because | I mention this because I have seen it happen. Yes,you can take a "fair, large and liberal view" that what the parties intended was to create an {{isdaprov|ATE}}, but why suffer that anxiety? | ||
{{isdaanatomy}} | {{isdaanatomy}} | ||