Events of Default - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

Line 36: Line 36:
Given that cross defaults may have artificially low {{isdaprov|Threshold Amount}}s (as do some of ours) and are set at levels where actual counterparties owning those rights directly are most unlikely to exercise them, it should not be a surprise to find parties resistant to notifying us about these.
Given that cross defaults may have artificially low {{isdaprov|Threshold Amount}}s (as do some of ours) and are set at levels where actual counterparties owning those rights directly are most unlikely to exercise them, it should not be a surprise to find parties resistant to notifying us about these.


This becomes a [[GFRM]] call but a practical recommendation would be:
This becomes a credit call but a practical recommendation would be:


#Impose notification requirement only on "active" termination/default events which are non-public and CP has no excuse for not having monitored them and counterparty has actually exercised; and
#Impose notification requirement only on "active" termination/default events which are non-public and CP has no excuse for not having monitored them and counterparty has actually exercised; and