Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977

Revision as of 08:58, 29 June 2023 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™


Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 — to its users, “UCTA” — is a plank of United Kingdom consumer protection legislation. It limits and in some places overrides basic common law principles as to what kind of losses or damages a contractual party can be liable to. Relevant for exclusion clauses which seek to ludicrously restrict the liability a merchant can have for doing what it promised to do.

On point in the extraordinarily ill-judged (by the appellant) litigation in ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis

Exclusion of liability for one’s negligence

Contractual exclusion of liability for negligence is outright prohibited should that negligence lead to death or personal injury:

Section 2(1) provides:

“A person cannot by reference to any contract term or to a notice given to persons generally or to particular persons exclude or restrict his liability for death or personal injury resulting from negligence.”[1]

In other cases is hedged around by a requirement for reasonableness:

“(2) In the case of other loss or damage, a person cannot so exclude or restrict his liability for negligence except in so far as the term or notice satisfies the requirement of reasonableness.

(3) Where a contract term or notice purports to exclude or restrict liability for negligence a person’s agreement to or awareness of it is not of itself to be taken as indicating his voluntary acceptance of any risk.[2]

See also

References