Template:M summ EFET Allowance Annex 6.1: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "Interesting comparison between ISDA on one hand, and IETA and EFET on the other, about whether {{{{{1}}}|Allowances need to be delivered '''from''' a specified {{{{{1}}}HA}} and not just ''to'' one. ISDA, as is the ’squad’s wont, a lot more prescriptive here than is IETA or EFET, neither of which trouble themselves with which {{{{{1}}}HA}} ''whence'' the Allowances come, only the {{{{{1}}}HA}} ''whither'' they go." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{emissions transfer of allowances summ|efetaprov}} | |||
Latest revision as of 11:08, 12 September 2023
Transfer from a specified Holding Account
Curious conditionality, across all three versions, where the Buyer specifies a Holding Account from which Allowances must be delivered, and not just the account to which they must be delivered. Quite why it should matter whence the Allowances come we cannot say — a vague fretfulness about theft perhaps? — but ok; let’s run with it.
Note, in any case, its moderation in IETA (5.2) whereby one has an obligation to make sure there are sufficient allowances in your account to satisfy your delivery obligation. So even though you can’t be forced to deliver from anywhere else, you can be sued for losses arising from your failure to ensure there was something to deliver in your Holding Account. All rather cack-handed, but in “fundamental upshot” terms, this does get to the right place.
The transfer is done once the Allowances hit the Seller’s account (I know, I know: you don’t say.) But wait: there is an interesting use of the word “whereupon” here, upon which we dwell in a bit more detail in the premium section.