Force Majeure - IETA Provision
IETA Emissions Trading Master Agreement A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™
Force Majeure in all its glory
Comparison See our natty emissions comparison table between the IETA, EFET and ISDA versions of emissions trading docs
Resources and Navigation
|
Overview
This is the IETA Master Agreement’s equivalent of a Settlement Disruption Event in the ISDA EU Emissions Annex. It is broadly the same, so you do wonder whose idea it was to call it something different.
Let us speculate: the IETA was written first, is independent of the ISDA universe, and for reasons best known to IETA’s crack drafting squad™, they decided to call this a Force Majeure. Being beyond the reasonable control of the affected party this is not entirely unreasonable.
ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ was, as usual, late to the “novel asset class” party and, as it couldn’t find a spot, decided to park its tanks on IETA’s lawn, borrowing much of the technology wholesale but unable to call this event a Force Majeure because the ISDA Master Agreement already has a Force Majeure Event, this is quite different, and that would confuse people even beyond ISDA’s tolerance for confusing people.[1]
So ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ went with its product specific “stuff happens” label, Settlement Disruption Event.
Summary
As per the overview, Force Majeure is substantially the same idea as “Settlement Disruption Event” in the ISDA EU Emissions Annex.
It is an event that, in each format:
- Is beyond the “affected party’s” reasonable control (having taking “all reasonable steps” to control it)
- Renders the delivery impossible to perform, acknowledging that this might be a problem at either end
- It excludes simply not having enough Allowances in your account, even if that is a result of some failure by a responsible official agency to issue Allowances in your account (as part of your annual allocation) or to replace stale allowances with fresh ones
- The hierarchy of Events of Default, Suspension Events and Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Events is also the same.
Premium content
Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics 👇
|
- The JC’s famous Nutshell™ summary of this clause
- Deeper comparison of Force Majeure with ISDA’s Settlement Disruption Event
- Comparison of Loss and Market Quotation with the 1992 ISDA equivalents.
See also
- Settlement Disruption Event under the ISDA EU Emissions Annex
- Loss and Market Quotation under the 1992 ISDA
References
- ↑ Seeing as the IETA Master Agreement borrows a bit of technology from the 1992 ISDA is is conceivable that IETA’s crack drafting squad™ didn’t realise there was a Force Majeure Event in the 2002 ISDA, as there was not one in the 1992 ISDA. I am guessing.