Holding and Using Posted Collateral (VM) - NY VM CSA Provision
2016 ISDA Credit Support Annex (VM) (New York law)
A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™ Holding and Using Posted Collateral in a Nutshell™
Original text
Resources and Navigation
|
Comparisons
The part of the New York law CSA that undoes all the sterling work that Paragraph 2 does to establish a Security Interest over collateral posted by a Pledgor to a Secured Party.
Note especially 6(c) Use of Posted Collateral — the rehypothecation/reuse right.
The 2016 version is all but the same as the 1994 version, except for a peppering of gratuitous “(VM)s”, until you get to Paragraph 6(d)(ii)(A). All that malarkey about interest transfers, adjustments and reductions at the back end of Paragraph 6(d) is new and, candidly, rather to be regretted. Here is a comparison.
Basics
Distributions
Handily, ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ captures all the forms of income that could kick off Posted Credit Support as “Distributions”:
“Distributions” means with respect to Posted Collateral (VM) other than Cash, all principal, interest and other payments and distributions of Cash or other property with respect thereto, regardless of whether the Secured Party has disposed of that Posted Collateral (VM) under Paragraph 6(c). Distributions will not include any item of property acquired by the Secured Party upon any disposition or liquidation of Posted Collateral (VM) or, with respect to any Posted Collateral (VM) in the form of Cash, any distributions on that collateral, unless otherwise specified herein.
Care of Posted Collateral
You can basically stop reading after “Without limiting the Secured Party’s rights under Paragraph 6(c)”. Because the Secured Party’s rights under 6(c) basically allow it to nuke your security interest the moment it receives your collateral. It can give your carefully pledged asset away.
In this way does security interest collateral arrangement with rehypothecation convert itself, for all intents and purposes, into a title transfer collateral arrangement. There is more on this, and rehypothecation, in the premium content.
Interest transfer, adjustments and reductions: the squad falls down a rabbit hole
“George, you can type this shit, but I can’t say it.”
- — Harrison Ford, to George Lucas, about the script of Star Wars
If you have got as far into the ghastly bowels of ISDA speak that you have been trying to parse the meaning of Paragraph 6(d)(ii)(A)(I) — just the numbering should tell you to stay well clear — then God’s speed to you. JC only got through it because he was multi-tasking while on an all-hands client money remediation legal workstream weekly stakeholder check in call, and frankly even ritualistic satanic torture would appeal compared to that. But what is it saying?
So:
You are holding Posted Collateral that pays some kind of income, in cash. Cash being cash, it is yours instantly: you can’t custody it.[1] So you have to “manufacture” a corresponding payment. This is a finicky legalistic point — true, but finicky. But okay. You are about to make an equivalent cash payment to the Pledgor (Para 6(d)(ii)(A)) — but the Pledgor also owes you more Posted Collateral (Para 6(d)(ii)(A)(I)) (maybe the Exposure has moved in your favour). What to do?
Premium content
Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics👇
|