Exchanges - CSA Provision

Revision as of 17:22, 16 December 2019 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Replaced content with "{{csaanat|3(c)|1995}}{{csa exchanges|csa}}")
ISDA 1995 English Law Credit Support Annex


In a Nutshell Section 3(c):

Template:Nutshell 1995 CSA 3(c) view template

1995 CSA full text of Section 3(c):

3(c) Exchanges.

3(c)(i) Unless otherwise specified in Paragraph 11, the Transferor may on any Local Business Day by notice inform the Transferee that it wishes to transfer to the Transferee Eligible Credit Support specified in that notice (the “New Credit Support”) in exchange for certain Eligible Credit Support (the “Original Credit Support”) specified in that notice comprised in the Transferor’s Credit Support Balance.
3(c)(ii) If the Transferee notifies the Transferor that it has consented to the proposed exchange, (A) the Transferor will be obliged to transfer the New Credit Support to the Transferee on the firstSettlement Day following the date on which it receives notice (which may be oral telephonic notice) from the Transferee of its consent and (B) the Transferee will be obliged to transfer to the Transferor Equivalent Credit Support in respect of the Original Credit Support not later than the Settlement Day following the date on which the Transferee receives the New Credit Support, unless otherwise specified in Paragraph 11(d) (the “Exchange Date”); provided that the Transferee will only be obliged to transfer Equivalent Credit Support with a Value as of the date of transfer as close as practicable to, but in any event not more than, the Value of the New Credit Support as of that date.

view template

Related Agreements
Click here for the text of Section 3(c) in the 1995 English Law CSA
Click here for the text of Section 3(c) in the 2016 English Law VM CSA
Click [[{{{3}}} - NY VM CSA Provision|here]] for the text of the equivalent, Section [[{{{3}}} - NY VM CSA Provision|{{{3}}}]] in the 2016 NY Law VM CSA
Comparisons
Template:Csadiff 3(c)
{{nycsadiff {{{3}}}}}

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

A counterparty who has posted one form of 1995 CSA and can ask the 1995 CSA to switch it for something else. The 1995 CSA doesn’t have to, but derivatives counterparties being the reasonable commercial fellows they are — and their operations teams being no-nonsense pragmatists they are — they will generally allow this as part of the normal ebb and flow of collateral operations. Probably less of a thing now 2016 VM CSAs tend to be cash only and base currency cash at that, but the possibility remains, and as, to our enduring regreet, we know, ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ is not usually one to let unexplored possibilities go undocumented.

Note here the 1995 CSA can ask for an exchange, but the 1995 CSA is not obliged to accept it. This is a fundamental provision of “title transfer”: once the 1995 CSA is delivered under a title-transfer 1995 CSA, the 1995 CSA owns it absolutely. It only has to return 1995 CSA. This is a special, legal ninja[1] use of the word “equivalent”. It means “fungible”; exactly the same as ~; not “broadly similar to ~”.

This is important also from a pricing (and operational) perspective: otherwise the 1995 CSA would have a “worst-of” option and would be entitled to continually switch into the "cheapest to deliver" of the 1995 CSA. Needless to say, the increased collateral flows would also increase the operational burden.

1995 CSAs: Contrast this with 1995 CSA, where a 1995 CSA has the option to deliver the cheapest of the 1995 CSA specified in the 1995 CSA.

1995 CSAs: A 1995 CSA does have a (limited) option in terms of selecting the 1995 CSA should there be a requirement to return posted credit support: it can select the cheapest to deliver of all the 1995 CSA that has been posted to it which currently comprises its 1995 CSA.

  1. Oh, all right, and GMSLA ninja, Repo ninja and other kinds of ninjas too.