(If any): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|plainenglish|[[File:Knee-slide.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Your [[legal eagle]] in the midst of a [[swept-back wing knee-slide]], yesterday.]]}}A two-word ''motif'' that, as much as any other, belies an [[Mediocre lawyer|attorney]]’s dark existential fear of {{sex|her}} own language. It speaks of a nervousness that, should a dependent clause bite on something that isn’t there, somehow the whole linguistic edifice will come crashing down; en edifice that can yet miraculously be affixed to the firmament with this single wipe of the [[legal eagle]]’s {{tag|flannel}}.
{{a|plainenglish|[[File:Knee-slide.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Your [[legal eagle]] in the midst of a [[swept-back wing knee-slide]], yesterday.]]}}A two-word ''motif'' that, as much as any other, belies an [[Mediocre lawyer|attorney]]’s dark existential fear of {{sex|her}} own language. It speaks of a nervousness that, should a dependent clause bite on something that isn’t there, somehow the whole linguistic edifice will come crashing down; en edifice that can yet miraculously be affixed to the firmament with this single wipe of the [[legal eagle]]’s {{tag|flannel}}.


:“''[blah blah blah] ... together with the amount, [[if any]], referred to below... [blah blah blah ad infinitum]''”
:“''[blah blah blah] ... together with the amount, [[if any]], that the Vendor incurs ... [blah blah blah ad infinitum]''”


See how it stymies the natural flow of your sentence? wouldn’t it be neater to say “''together with '''any''' amount''”?  Why add that inessential adjectival clause?  
See how it stymies the natural flow of your sentence? wouldn’t it be neater to say “''together with '''any''' amount''”?  Why add that inessential adjectival clause?