Template:Calculation agent dispute

Revision as of 11:53, 13 April 2017 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===Should you include a dispute right for determinations made by the calculation agent?=== Recognising that “should you?”, and “will you have to”, are different questi...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Should you include a dispute right for determinations made by the calculation agent?

Recognising that “should you?”, and “will you have to”, are different questions, here is how it rolls.

Client’s lawyer: we must have a dispute right so help me.

  • The Dealer will be the Calculation Agent. (True.)
  • The Dealer will be the Hedging Party. (True.)
  • The Dealer will be the Determining Party. (True.)
  • Dealers are bad, venal people. They have blackened hearts and will stop at nothing to rip their clients’ faces off. We need some check on their unfettered and sure-to-be outrageously exercised discretion. (A matter of debate, but if that’s your starting point your foundational premise is why are you doing business with this vassal in the first place?)