Interpretation - CSA Provision: Difference between revisions

Interpretation - CSA Provision (view source)

30 bytes added , 15 December 2016

no edit summary

82,891

edits

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''Nomenclature''': Being an annex to an {{isdama}}, references to the “{{isdaprov|Agreement}}” means that particular {{isdama}}; the “{{csaprov|Annex}}” is the {{tag|CSA}} and, if you were pedantic enough that you really felt the need to refer to it, the “{{isdaprov|Schedule}}” is the schedule to the {{isdama}}.
-Covered Transactions as a concept only arrives in the 2016 version. until then, the neatest way of describing whether a given set of Transactions are covered or not is to say something like:
+{{csaprov|Covered Transaction}}s as a concept only arrives in the {{2016csa}}. Until then, the neatest way of describing whether a given set of {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s are covered or not is to say something like:
 “
-[SPECIFY] Transactions will [not] be relevant for purposes of determining “Exposure” under the {{csa}}.
+[SPECIFY] Transactions will [not] be relevant for purposes of determining ““Exposure”” under the {{csa}}.
 ”