82,891
edits
Interpretation - CSA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Interpretation - CSA Provision (view source)
Revision as of 14:06, 15 December 2016
, 15 December 2016no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fullanat2|csa|1|1995|1|2016}} | {{fullanat2|csa|1|1995|1|2016}} | ||
'''Nomenclature''': Being an annex to an {{isdama}}, references to the “{{isdaprov|Agreement}}” means that particular {{isdama}}; the “{{csaprov|Annex}}” is the {{tag|CSA}} and, if you were pedantic enough that you really felt the need to refer to it, the “{{isdaprov|Schedule}}” is the schedule to the {{isdama}}. | '''Nomenclature''': Being an annex to an {{isdama}}, references to the “{{isdaprov|Agreement}}” means that particular {{isdama}}; the “{{csaprov|Annex}}” is the {{tag|CSA}} and, if you were pedantic enough that you really felt the need to refer to it, the “{{isdaprov|Schedule}}” is the schedule to the {{isdama}}. | ||
Covered Transactions as a concept only arrives in the 2016 version. until then, the neatest way of describing whether a given set of Transactions are covered or not is to say something like: | |||
“ | |||
[SPECIFY] Transactions will [not] be relevant for purposes of determining “Exposure” under the {{csa}}. | |||
” | |||