Interpretation - CSA Provision: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fullanat2|csa|1|1995|1|2016}}
{{csaanat|1|1995}}
'''Nomenclature''': Being an annex to an {{isdama}}, references to the “{{isdaprov|Agreement}}” means that particular {{isdama}}; the “{{csaprov|Annex}}” is the {{tag|CSA}} and, if you were pedantic enough that you really felt the need to refer to it, the “{{isdaprov|Schedule}}” is the schedule to the {{isdama}}.
'''Nomenclature''': Being an annex to an {{isdama}}, references to the “{{isdaprov|Agreement}}” means that particular {{isdama}}; the “{{csaprov|Annex}}” is the {{tag|CSA}} and, if you were pedantic enough that you really felt the need to refer to it, the “{{isdaprov|Schedule}}” is the schedule to the {{isdama}}.


{{csaprov|Covered Transaction}}s as a concept only arrives in the {{2016csa}}. Until then, the neatest way of describing whether a given set of {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s are covered or not is to say something like:  
{{csaprov|Covered Transaction}}s as a concept only arrives in the {{2016csa}}. Until then, the neatest way of describing whether a given set of {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s are covered or not is to say something like:  
[SPECIFY] Transactions will [not] be relevant for purposes of determining ““Exposure”” under the {{csa}}.
[SPECIFY] Transactions will [not] be relevant for purposes of determining ““[[Exposure - CSA Provision|Exposure]]”” under the {{csa}}.

Navigation menu