View source for Insolvency and bankruptcy

{{a|negotiation|{{subtable|{{small|80}}
'''123 Definition of inability to pay debts. '''
:(1) A company is deemed [[unable to pay its debts]]—
::(a) if a creditor (by assignment or otherwise) to whom the company is indebted in a sum exceeding £750 then due has served on the company, by leaving it at the company’s registered office, a written demand (in the prescribed form) requiring the company to pay the sum so due and the company has for 3 weeks thereafter neglected to pay the sum or to secure or compound for it to the reasonable satisfaction of the creditor, or
::(b) if, in England and Wales, execution or other process issued on a judgment, decree or order of any court in favour of a creditor of the company is returned unsatisfied in whole or in part, or
::(c) if, in Scotland, the induciae of a charge for payment on an extract decree, or an extract registered bond, or an extract registered protest, have expired without payment being made, or
::(d) if, in Northern Ireland, a certificate of unenforceability has been granted in respect of a judgment against the company, or
::(e) if it is proved to the satisfaction of the court that the company is [[unable to pay its debts as they fall due]]<ref>This is [[cashflow insolvency]]</ref>.
:(2) A company is also deemed [[unable to pay its debts]] if it is proved to the satisfaction of the court that the value of the company’s assets is less than the amount of its liabilities, taking into account its contingent and prospective liabilities. <ref>This is “[[balance sheet insolvency]]”.</ref>
:(3) The money sum for the time being specified in subsection (1)(a) is subject to increase or reduction by order under section 416 in Part XV.</div>}}}}{{qd|Insolvency|ɪnˈsɒlvᵊnsi|n|A [[credit officer]]’s blackest fear. {{L1}}(''[[Cashflow insolvency|Cashflow ~]]''): That one cannot pay one’s bills when due.<li> (''[[Balancesheet insolvency|Balancesheet ~]]''): That one owes more than one has.</ol>}}

The statutory definition of [[insolvency]] in the UK — which only applies to UK persons, of course — appears in Section 123 of the [[Insolvency Act 1986]], and is set out in the panel, and includes [[cashflow insolvency]] (123(1)(e)) and [[balance sheet insolvency]] (Section 123(2)). Of these two, balance sheet insolvency deserves a bit more coverage:

===Balance-sheet insolvency===
also known as “[[technical insolvency]]” or “[[accounting insolvency]]”, “[[Balance sheet insolvency]]”, like [[cashflow insolvency]], is a variety of being “[[unable to pay its debts|unable to pay one’s debts]]”, an expression which in turn features in many definitions of “[[insolvency]]” or “[[bankruptcy]]”. 

Compared with the carefully crafted prose of other limbs, this seems a dangerously vague expression. But it has a pretty technical meaning — conferred by statute, no less — Section 123(2) of the [[Insolvency Act 1986]], which says a company will be deemed [[unable to pay its debts]] “''if it is proved to the satisfaction of the court that the value of the company’s assets is less than the amount of its liabilities, taking into account its [[contingent liability|contingent]] and prospective liabilities''”. This is what we mean by [[balance sheet insolvency]].

English courts have recently had an opportunity consider what this means, and have resourcefully concluded: “what it says”.

In {{casenote|BNY Corporate Trustees|Eurosail}} the Supreme Court noted that while this test this is often called “[[balance sheet insolvency]]” it can’t be satisfied purely by reference to the company's statutory balance sheet, because that may omit important information like [[contingent liability|contingent liabilities]]. Nor does it mean that the company has “reached the point of no return because of an incurable deficiency of assets”, which was what the Court of Appeal in this case had hypothesised. 

The court decided that for “the value of the company’s assets to be less than the amount of its liabilities, taking into account its [[contingent liability|contingent]] and prospective liabilities” the court must be satisfied, on the [[balance of probabilities]], that the company has insufficient assets to be able to meet all its liabilities including prospective and contingent liabilities ''(I know what you’re thinking by the way — the highest court in the land isn’t adding a whole lot of value at this point is it?)'' discounted for contingencies and deferment. 

Whether that is satisfied depends on the particular circumstances, and the burden of proof will be on the party asserting insolvency.

===Insolvency generally===
Broadly, it means you do not have sufficient assets to meet your liabilities, and you are no longer a viable business. Your [[creditor]]s are entitled to apply to the court for the appointment of a [[receiver]] who will liquidate your assets, determine your liabilities, and distribute the proceeds of that liquidation to your creditors pro rata. After that, the game is up and you no longer exist.

There are all sorts of special regimes and intermediate statuses in different jurisdictions (such as America's famous Chapter 11 protection - designed to help a struggling company reorganise itself and get out of insolvency without going to the wall - and [[bank]]s and [[financial institution]]s generally will be subject to [[bank resolution and recovery regime]]s which make the winding-up process a little bit more complicated. 

{{Capsule insolvency termination}}
====Difference between insolvency and bankruptcy====
{{drop|T|he question oft}} arises what is the difference — even, is there one? — between ''insolvency'' and ''bankruptcy''.
{{Insolvency v bankruptcy capsule}}

{{sa}}
*{{isdaprov|Bankruptcy}} under the {{isdama}}
{{ref}}