View source for Template:M summ 2000 GMSLA 6.1

[[6.1 - 2000 GMSLA Provision|What]] is the significance of the wording “... ''would have been entitled to receive''...”? What if the {{gmsla2000prov|Issuer}} is obliged to make the payment, but doesn’t? Does the {{gmsla2000prov|Borrower}} of such a stock [[guarantee]] the {{gmsla2000prov|Issuer}}’s performance? It is hard to see how this is intended, but that is one way you could read the wording.

In the {{gmsla}} it the wording is modified (Clauses {{gmslaprov|6.2}} and {{gmslaprov|6.3}}) to provide “... ''that would '''be''' received ''...”
{{income paid in relation to securities}} 
{{2000 gmsla Loaned Securities}}
{{GMSLA compensation for mismanagement}}