Search results

...Anderson, an accounting consultant in 1998. He was on the Nobel committee who awarded its economic prize to Black and Scholes. He was Jericho Moody, whos ...an undead army of [[Financial weapons of mass destruction|phantom ISDAs]] who lie upon the dead earth as spores, and the prophecies of the [[Good Man]] m

...day at around 11:55 am London time by the [[British Bankers’ Association]] who, it is fair to say, didn’t have a terribly good handle on what [[LIBOR]] ...nally calculated it — which meant it was ideal fodder for pernicious types who lurk in the undergarments of the financial services industry ripping everyo

...th buried roots and [[faux pas]] for the unwary to trip over. Beware those who refer to their agreement as an [[eye-ess-dee-aye]] (it's [[izder]]), or a t

...one — whether inside your organisation of outside it — reverse engineering who the individuals are, then you are ''not'' processing personal data. ...ised data will not be considered personal data in the hands of a recipient who does not have the additional decoding information needed to re-identify the

Hands up who has not had these misgivings: On the other hand, who has not felt the following (we should note the JC is coming around to the v

...o stop ''them'' tilting the scales in their own favour, and what of people who legitimately disagree?” It used to be only beauty contestants who aspired to end conflict and live blissed out in peace, love and happiness:

...of Goldman’s story that Roberts is not one man but a series of individuals who pass the Roberts name and reputation when they are wealthy enough to retire

...induction programme, yesterday. Looks a bit like [[Struwwelpeter|Augustus who wouldn’t eat his soup]], doesn’t he.}}}}{{dpn|/treɪˈniː/|n|}} ...a twinge of sympathy? The same sorts who would cuddle polar bears, that’s who. They don’t last long.

}}Stylish, elegant, a [[spandrel]] fancier — who isn’t? — and he irritated the living ''piss'' out of {{author|Richard D

Even people who ''complain'' about power structures — at least ones who do in an organised and compelling way — have a power structure. [[Critica ...con''structive, enabling, levers to prosperity and betterment for everyone who wants it. If we call such a centralised, curated, defended store of knowled

{{a|work|{{image|serious people|gif|You know it.}} }}{{quote|“I love you, but you are not serious people.” ...process of the [[JC]] aging, reaching age-parity with the sorts of people who get to run the world, and realising they were — well, jerks, mainly —

...is a management thought experiment<ref>I know what you are thinking: ''“''Who knew [[Middle management|management]] experimented with ''thought''?” Act ...et experts, whom I have empowered, to deal with sensible customers, whom I know well, in a prudent manner, with a view to maximising [[shareholder]] return

...viour is destructive to the present configuration of the system, and those who stand to gain from the present configuration will be hostile to arbitrage. ...t jeopardise the resilience of individual actors at the top of the system, who will, hence take steps to close architecture, mute plurality and shut down

Day 1: There is this dude who owns a thing. The dude we will call a “[[settlor]]”, and the thing we w ...l ownership fails.The trust has no separate legal personality, so a person who owns all the legal title and all the beneficial interest in an asset is not

One who understands the [[Territory|territory]] and therefore the [[Map|map]]’s l ...f those benighted people without whom the organisation would not function, who are nonetheless poorly paid, forced to live in a dungeon below ground, bein

...peeling off towards [[human resources]] and [[head-hunter]]).<ref>Whether those latter feeble strands are some kind of nascent [[Evolution|Darwinian evolut Only the stoutest stay put. Those who do — who don’t evolve, or adapt, but keep within their darkened partnerships, thri

...e. This is a system effect, and not some conspiracy the man against people who can’t be bothered to commute.

...scale game of [[prisoner’s dilemma]]. </ref> the piss-takers and grifters who hide in plain sight, without doing any work at all, in every large corporat ...That is bullshit ''squared'', especially if they’re auditing other people who themselves are carrying out largely bullshitty roles.

''Not to be confused with a [[receiving party]] — being the one who is sent confidential information — in an [[NDA]].''

...On this view “portion” probably exists only to suit [[lawyer]]<nowiki/>s, who have a yen, er, ''[[ceteris paribus]]'', for words that are longer and more