Does not compute

Revision as of 10:30, 25 November 2021 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|devil|}}What portion of the great, massed oeuvre or executed legal verbiage owes its place in that canon to the failure or refusal of one party to understand what the...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

What portion of the great, massed oeuvre or executed legal verbiage owes its place in that canon to the failure or refusal of one party to understand what the legal contract is trying to do, or the basic principles of the commercial law behind it, and the other party not wishing to die in a ditch about to get the concept across?

How much of our discourse, that is to say, is basically conditioned by ignorance?

See also