Survival of Obligations - 1992 ISDA Provision

1992 ISDA Master Agreement

A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™

Overview — Summary — Premium — See also — Wikitext

Crosscheck:
→’87 equivalent
→’92 equivalent
→’02 equivalent

9(c) in a Nutshell™

The JC’s Nutshell™ summary of this term has moved uptown to the subscription-only ninja tier. For the cost of ½ a weekly 🍺 you can get it here. Sign up at Substack. You can even ask questions! Ask about it here.

Original text

9(c) Survival of Obligations. Without prejudice to Sections 2(a)(iii) and 6(c)(ii), the obligations of the parties under this Agreement will survive the termination of any Transaction.

See ISDA Comparison for a comparison between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA.

The Varieties of ISDA Experience
Subject	2002 (wikitext)	1992 (wikitext)	1987 (wikitext)
Preamble	Pre	Pre	Pre
Interpretation	1	1	1
Obligns/Payment	2	2	2
Representations	3	3	3
Agreements	4	4	4
EODs & Term Events	5 Events of Default: FTPD • Breach • CSD • Misrep • DUST • Cross Default • Bankruptcy • MWA Termination Events: Illegality • FM • Tax Event • TEUM • CEUM • ATE	5 Events of Default: FTPD • Breach • CSD • Misrep • DUST • Cross Default • Bankruptcy • MWA Termination Events: Illegality • Tax Event • TEUM • CEUM • ATE	5 Events of Default: FTPD • Breach • CSD • Misrep • DUSS • Cross Default • Bankruptcy • MWA Termination Events: Illegality • Tax Event • TEUM • CEUM
Early Termination	6 Early Termination: ET right on EOD • ET right on TE • Effect of Designation • Calculations; Payment Date • Payments on ET • Set-off	6 Early Termination: ET right on EOD • ET right on TE • Effect of Designation • Calculations • Payments on ET • Set-off	6 Early Termination: ET right on EOD • ET right on TE • Effect of Designation • Calculations • Payments on ET
Transfer	7	7	7
Contractual Currency	8	8	8
Miscellaneous	9	9	9
Offices; Multibranch Parties	10	10	10
Expenses	11	11	11
Notices	12	12	12
Governing Law	13	13	13
Definitions	14	14	14
Schedule	Schedule	Schedule	Schedule
Termination Provisions	Part 1	Part 1	Part 1
Tax Representations	Part 2	Part 2	Part 2
Documents for Delivery	Part 3	Part 3	Part 3
Miscellaneous	Part 4	Part 4	Part 4
Other Provisions	Part 5	Part 5	Part 5

Resources and Navigation

Index: Click ᐅ to expand: ISDA

Comparisons

Section 9(c) is identical as between 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA.

Basics

Netting and close-out

Why should this matter here? Well, because netting, in a word. Here the fabulous nuances of the ISDA Master Agreement come into play. Close-out netting — as we all know, a clever if somewhat artificial and, in practical application, quite tedious concept — is not something that just happens by operation of the common law. Set-off, which does, is a narrower and flakier thing requiring all kinds of mutuality that might not apply to your ISDA Master Agreement.

The contractual device of close-out netting, by contrast, relies on the patient midwifery of ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ and the sophisticated contrivances they popped into the ISDA Master Agreement: especially the parts that say all Transactions form a Single Agreement, and those long and dusty passages in Section 6 which painfully recount how one terminates those Transactions and nets down all the resulting exposures should things go tits up.

Now, it really wouldn’t do if one were found to have thrown those clever legal artifacts on the fire before seeking the common law’s help to manage your way out of a portfolio with a busted counterparty would it. Section 9(c) is there to avoid the doubt that you might have done so: Just because you’ve declared an Early Termination Date, that doesn’t mean all bets are off. Just the live Transactions.

As far as the JC can see, through his fogged-up, purblind spectacles, this doubt, like most, didn’t need avoiding and shouldn’t have been present in the mind of a legal eagle of stout mental fortitude: it is clear on its face that terminating a transaction under pre-specified mechanism in the contract is not to cancel the contract and sue for damages, but to exercise an option arising under it, and all your mechanical firepower remains in place.

Indeed, there is no mechanism for terminating an ISDA Master Agreement itself, at all. Even in peace-time. This has led at least one commentator to hypothesise that this proves that derivatives trading is all some kind of Illuminati conspiracy.

Premium content

Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics👇

JC’s “nutshell” summary of the clause
Background reading and long-form essays
- The subtle difference between an event of default and a fundamental breach of contract

References