Transaction - 1992 ISDA Provision

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1992 ISDA Master Agreement

A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™

preamble in a Nutshell

The JC’s Nutshell summaries are moving to the subscription-only ninja tier. For the cost of ½ a weekly 🍺 you can get them here. Sign up at Substack.

preamble in all its glory

(Multicurrency — Cross Border)
ISDA

International Swap Dealers Association, Inc.



MASTER AGREEMENT

dated as of ......................................


[SPECIFY] and [SPECIFY]

have entered and/or anticipate entering into one or more transactions (each a “Transaction”) that are or will be governed by this Master Agreement, which includes the schedule (the “Schedule”), and the documents and other confirming evidence (each a “Confirmation”) exchanged between the parties confirming those Transactions.
Accordingly, the parties agree as follows: —

Related agreements and comparisons

Related Agreements
Click here for the text of Section preamble in the 2002 ISDA
Comparisons
Template:Isdadiff preamble

Resources and Navigation

Overview

edit

Like all good stories, the ISDA starts with a Preamble. Everyone, once, stares at that gnomic title and thinks, “okay, what the hell is this all about?”

Well, step this way, young padawan. Step into this rabbithole. A fellow called Gerald[1] asked a callow young contrarian to look at an aye-ess-dee-aye once, in about 1995, and — well, here we all are, folks. Honestly, if I had known how much time I was going to spend with the damn thing I would have paid a lot more attention in the first place.

A word on industry associations

ISDA, who publishes the ISDA, is the International Swaps and Derivatives Association. Those with a keen eye will note that, some time between 1992 and 2002, it rebranded from the “International Swap Dealers Associations, Inc.” — interesting plural, that, but in any case an outwardly sell-side outfit — to the more neutral-sounding “International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.”: singular, at the same time more unitary and more inclusive sounding, but still in spirit the same old ISDA, stake-held predominantly by the largest broker-dealers on the face of the Earth. It may have aspirations to conquer the world but for now ISDA remains a “dealer-community” association.

As we note elsewhere, there is typically a “sell-side” broker and a “buy-side” end user to an ISDA Master Agreement.

These days the “buy-side lobby” is a lot bigger, more organised and better represented than it used to be, with AIMA (the Alternative Investment Management Association),[2] EFAMA (the European Fund and Asset Management Association,[3] the MFA (the Managed Funds Association),[4] (not to be confused, by the way, with the Fund Management Association of Kenya) and the IA (the Investment Association),[5] representing their interests.

The preamble

The preamble is just the loosener before things get properly going, and there is not a lot to see. It has not really changed a lot between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA (nor indeed, from the 1987 ISDA, except that the Single Agreement clause got promoted from a casual remark during the warm-up, in the 1987 ISDA, to the first searching delivery of the first over.[6]

Summary

edit

The preamble, which talks in somewhat laboured terms about the architecture of the ISDA contract, is the only place in the ISDA Master Agreement where the concept of the “Transaction” — being the actual swaps you put on under one of these confounded agreements — is defined.

Premium content

Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics 👇
  • The JC’s famous Nutshell summary of this clause

Template:M premium 1992 ISDA preamble

edit

See also

edit

Template:M sa 1992 ISDA preamble

References

  1. Hi Gerald!
  2. https://www.aima.org
  3. https://www.efama.org
  4. https://www.managedfunds.org
  5. https://www.theia.org
  6. Cricket metaphor. To our American readers, we would say sorry, except that we are not. There will be cricket analogies throughout.