Search results

...nd she gives you, so you can make payments under your [[Transaction - ISDA Provision|transactions]]. Often memorialized in a [[master trading agreement]] but ju

[[Other CSA - VM CSA Provision|See]] also Paragraph {{csaprov|1(b)}}, which expounds itself thus: :''{{ISDA English Law Credit Support Annex 2016 1(b)}}''

...'' — “[[First Method - ISDA Provision|First]]” and “[[Second Method - ISDA Provision|Second]]” Methods. There is a “{{isda92prov|Settlement Amount}}” conc {{eta vs close-out amount|{{{1}}}}}

...oceed directly to Section {{{{{1}}}|6(e)}} to determine the {{{{{1}}}|Close-out Amount}} (if you are under a {{2002ma}}, or “tiresomely unlabelled amo ...dit Support Document}} — at the very point you call upon it, the {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}} will vanish.

...t economically being totally distinct, relating as they do to discrete ring-fenced “Series” issued by the [[SPV]] and you absolutely do ''not'' want ...heaven forbid [[Netting - ISDA Provision|netted]], just because some other Transaction, relating to another series, has gone [[Tetas arriba|''arriba'']].

...ere and to whom, for {{{{{1}}}|Option Transaction}}s and {{{{{1}}}|Forward Transaction}}s. ...key concepts in {{euaprov|Option Transaction}}s ''and'' {{euaprov|Forward Transaction}}s.

...ricans now seem to acknowledge, ''improves'' the process of closing out an ISDA. (Want to see how awful the 1992 is? Go [[6(e)(i) - 1992 ISDA Provision|''here'']]).

...ditional Termination Events}}, which may be counterparty or even {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}}-specific. ...improbable<ref>“The chances of anything coming from Mars were a million-to-one,” he said. Yet, still they came.</ref> like an alien invasion.

=== Non-Reliance === [[Non-Reliance - ISDA Provision|Also]], for good order, in not so many words and for no compelling reason,

...rov|Allowance Strike Price}}, in the case of an {{euaprov|Allowance Option Transaction}}, as the case may be” you might think Allowance Price might have been a

...alberne kerle zu spielen]]'' with the [[flawed asset]] provisions in your ISDA — though, newsflash: it ''won’t'', as long as its risk team retains pos ...e is a lengthy disquisition about it in the [[pjc:Section 2(a)(iii) - ISDA Provision#The prepaid puts and calls conundrum|premium]] section of our article on Se

...he waste of trees: {{eqderivprov|Transaction}}s tend to be vanilla, [[delta-one]] and traded in high volumes. ...” quickly emerged — sort of intermediate steps between a [[Schedule - ISDA Provision|Schedule]] and a trade {{isdaprov|Confirmation}} allowing parties to agree

...ctical, economic difference between being closed out on the same {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}} for an {{{{{1}}}|Event of Default}} and a {{{{{1}}}|Termination Event}}? ...of intuit, in a sort of semi-conscious, buried-somewhere-deep-in-the-brain-stem kind of way, but they may mutter darkly and try to change the subject i

{{small|180}}[[Preamble - 1992 ISDA Provision|MASTER AGREEMENT]]</div><br> ...anticipate entering into one or more transactions (each a “'''{{isda92prov|Transaction}}'''”) that are or will be governed by this {{isda92prov|Master Agreement

}}Now the timings of the various payments under the ISDA architecture lead to one rather odd effect: ..., and then the [[in-the-money]] party decides to realise the value of that Transaction (or — I dunno — the swap just gets to its scheduled termination date, t

[[9.3 - Pledge GMSLA Provision|Note]] the clear exclusion of indirect and [[consequential loss]]es, as wel ...al'' [[close out]] on an {{gmslaprov|Event of Default}} (a {{pgmslaprov|Buy-in}} ''isn’t'' an {{pgmslaprov|Event of Default}}), and only on profession

...Equity Derivatives Provision|Equity Swaps]] as if they were undated [[delta-one]] exposures — which, unless the [[Tax attorney|Master in Charge of Tax ===The {{eqderivprov|Calculation Period}} that didn’t bark in the night-time===

...y discussion of this [[pjc:Events of Default and Termination Events - ISDA Provision|here]] for our premium readers. ...rs’ drink. Because it might not technically be — but it ''is''. </ref> The ISDA is — unique? Pioneering? Overcomplicated? — in having two types of even

[[2.4 - Equity Derivatives Provision|You]] will forgive us for not getting too excited about the {{eqderivprov|P ...alberne kerle zu spielen]]'' with the [[flawed asset]] provisions in your ISDA — newsflash: it ''won’t'', as long as its risk team retains possession

{{2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions Section 6 TOC}} ...ht come — especially if the [[Market Disruption Event - Equity Derivatives Provision|Market Disruption]] is prolonged — but as long as you are in the {{eqderi