Market Quotation - 1992 ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Replaced content with "{{manual|MI|1992|Market Quotation|section||medium}}") Tag: Replaced |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{newisda92manual|Market Quotation}} |
Latest revision as of 13:27, 5 January 2024
1992 ISDA Master Agreement
A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™ ISDA Text: Market Quotation
Related agreements and comparisons
Resources and Navigation
|
Overview
Market Quotation and Loss were both ditched as Transaction valuation concepts under the 2002 ISDA in favour of Close-out Amount, which is closer to Loss, but still a bit different.
Summary
If it weren’t so long ago, you would honestly say this ludicrous Market Quotation and Loss, and First Method and Second Method confection was designed with the sole purpose of keeping negotiators in tedious employment. It is all handled so much more deftly under the 2002 ISDA with the concept of Close-out Amount.
Premium content
Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics 👇
|
- The JC’s famous Nutshell™ summary of this clause
- Pricing methodology
- What where, as there will be, there are fewer than three quotations
- MQ vs Exposure under the CSA
- Dealer polls and Lehman