Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- 23 bytes (4 words) - 19:24, 19 December 2020
- ...rect[[Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation - Case Note]]86 bytes (12 words) - 16:38, 25 August 2017
- 25 bytes (4 words) - 19:06, 19 December 2020
- 30 bytes (4 words) - 19:22, 19 December 2020
- ...udgmt/jd050630/nat-1.htm click here for transcript].</ref> is an important case about [[fixed charge]]s and the [[doctrine of precedent]], that [[Golden th ...om Spectrum Plus’s point of view — fancy winning a landmark House of Lords case but — well, hard lines fellas. But [[Little old ladies make bad law|Littl11 KB (1,751 words) - 19:22, 19 December 2020
- 27 bytes (4 words) - 19:18, 19 December 2020
- ...ite|Enron Australia|TXU Electricity Ltd|2003|NSWSC|1169}} is a [[Straya]]n case focusing on the {{isdaprov|General Conditions}} clause of the {{isdama}}.1 KB (212 words) - 19:06, 19 December 2020
- ===The case===3 KB (453 words) - 14:17, 29 September 2023
- ...ef> on the subject of a [[master]]’s liability for its [[beast]]s, in this case Rex, an elderly beagle with a bladder infection — an [[animal]] ''[[mansu689 bytes (112 words) - 16:26, 4 November 2016
- 401 bytes (59 words) - 19:21, 19 December 2020
- 28 bytes (3 words) - 18:40, 18 November 2020
- 27 bytes (4 words) - 19:27, 19 December 2020
- 29 bytes (4 words) - 19:06, 19 December 2020
- ...{Casenote1|In Re Bassett|}} 285 F.3d 882, 886 (9th Cir. 2002) is a leading case ruminating on the [[Uniform Commercial Code]] and the meaning of [[conspicu The case did not concern the ministrations of a domesticated (“'''[[mansuetae natu2 KB (378 words) - 19:12, 19 December 2020
- {{cn}}{{cite|Stein|Blake|1995|1AC|243}} is a key case on [[insolvency set-off]], affirming as it does 1972’s epochal {{casenote *[[National Westminster Bank Ltd v Halesowen - Case Note]]537 bytes (73 words) - 19:27, 19 December 2020
- 32 bytes (4 words) - 19:27, 19 December 2020
- {{cn}}The great case of {{citer|Hadley|Baxendale|1854|156 ER|145}}, on the types of loss availab4 KB (621 words) - 19:08, 19 December 2020
- 27 bytes (4 words) - 19:12, 19 December 2020
- 41 bytes (5 words) - 19:21, 19 December 2020
- {{cn}}{{Cite|Goldsworthy|Brickell|[1987]|Ch|378}} is a case on the seldom talked-about topic of [[laches]]. {{c|Case Note}}612 bytes (99 words) - 19:07, 19 December 2020
- 34 bytes (4 words) - 19:03, 19 December 2020
- 4 KB (756 words) - 19:16, 19 December 2020
- 34 bytes (4 words) - 19:28, 19 December 2020
- 1 KB (250 words) - 19:27, 19 December 2020
- 36 bytes (4 words) - 19:07, 19 December 2020
- 33 bytes (4 words) - 19:29, 19 December 2020
- 32 bytes (4 words) - 19:29, 19 December 2020
- ...tp://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1994/5.html Judgment]</ref> is a leading case concerning [[concurrent liability]] in [[contract]] and [[tort]]. It concer4 KB (581 words) - 19:11, 19 December 2020
- 30 bytes (4 words) - 19:16, 19 December 2020
- ...n) would be covered by the general [[legal advice privilege]]. Per general case law, the starting proposition was no: information given by one employee to4 KB (569 words) - 19:29, 19 December 2020
- ...t might well not have been “commercially reasonable”. But that is not this case. The Court cited favourably the famous case of {{casenote|AP Picture Houses|Wednesbury}}.4 KB (711 words) - 19:03, 19 December 2020
- 34 bytes (4 words) - 19:05, 19 December 2020
- 32 bytes (4 words) - 19:08, 19 December 2020
- 32 bytes (4 words) - 19:26, 19 December 2020
- 32 bytes (4 words) - 19:16, 19 December 2020
- ...t case of {{casenote|Heald|Kenworthy}}. Discussed at some length in the US case {{casenote|Poretta|Superior Dowel Company}} (transcript [http://law.justia.577 bytes (85 words) - 19:28, 19 December 2020
- Anyway, enough of the historical context. This case is authority for the ancient principle that ''a [[loan]] of money on demand ...g bad bank, and defendant a [[Little old lady|little old lady - or in this case man]] — all the more so one who had recently popped clogs — so the mode2 KB (414 words) - 16:43, 7 November 2019
- 72 bytes (12 words) - 13:00, 18 August 2022
- 30 bytes (3 words) - 12:14, 22 October 2020
- 31 bytes (4 words) - 19:11, 19 December 2020
- {{cn}}A formative case on the principle of [[undisclosed agent|undisclosed agency]] in which Parke711 bytes (105 words) - 19:11, 19 December 2020
- {{cn}}The case of the Reasonable Woman, as reported by A. P. Herbert. There are times wher “The Court of Appeal to-day delivered judgment in this important case.10 KB (1,815 words) - 19:06, 19 December 2020
- 33 bytes (4 words) - 19:11, 19 December 2020
- 43 bytes (5 words) - 19:12, 19 December 2020
- #REDIRECT [[RBS Rights Issue Litigation - Case Note]]53 bytes (8 words) - 16:38, 25 August 2017
- {{cn}}The leading case on [[waiver by estoppel]] and [[promissory estoppel]], seized on by the lat3 KB (599 words) - 19:12, 19 December 2020
- 46 bytes (5 words) - 19:21, 19 December 2020
- 43 bytes (6 words) - 19:04, 19 December 2020
- 47 bytes (5 words) - 19:07, 19 December 2020
- 34 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 19 December 2020
Page text matches
- {{cn}}{{cite|Stein|Blake|1995|1AC|243}} is a key case on [[insolvency set-off]], affirming as it does 1972’s epochal {{casenote *[[National Westminster Bank Ltd v Halesowen - Case Note]]537 bytes (73 words) - 19:27, 19 December 2020
- ...d v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited - Case Note|Rock Advertising]]'' case===561 bytes (76 words) - 11:36, 21 March 2024
- #redirect[[Category:Case Note]]31 bytes (4 words) - 17:42, 27 April 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Moorcock - Case Note]]38 bytes (6 words) - 14:16, 29 September 2023
- #redirect[[Re Spectrum Plus - Case Note]]41 bytes (7 words) - 10:43, 19 March 2018
- #redirect[[Enron v TXU - Case Note]]36 bytes (7 words) - 08:44, 17 July 2019
- #redirect[[ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis - Case Note]]48 bytes (8 words) - 10:17, 18 April 2018
- #REDIRECT [[Henderson v Merrett - Case Note]]45 bytes (7 words) - 11:18, 1 July 2020
- #REDIRECT [[RBS Rights Issue Litigation - Case Note]]53 bytes (8 words) - 16:38, 25 August 2017
- #redirect[[Metavante v Lehman - Case Note]]43 bytes (7 words) - 09:34, 28 January 2016
- #redirect[[Three Rivers No. 5 - Case Note]]43 bytes (7 words) - 10:36, 22 January 2018
- #redirect[[Three Rivers No. 5 - Case Note]]43 bytes (7 words) - 11:41, 22 January 2018
- #redirect[[Hedley Byrne v Heller - Case Note]]46 bytes (8 words) - 15:30, 7 September 2016
- #REDIRECT [[Marine Trade v Pioneer - Case Note]]48 bytes (8 words) - 09:34, 28 January 2016
- #redirect[[Re Lehman Brothers International - Case Note]]57 bytes (8 words) - 17:51, 18 January 2018
- #redirect[[Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC - Case Note]]60 bytes (10 words) - 08:46, 24 June 2019
- #redirect[[Lomas v Firth Rixson - Case Note]]45 bytes (8 words) - 17:41, 26 April 2016
- #redirect[[AP Picture Houses v Wednesbury - Case Note]]55 bytes (9 words) - 14:27, 16 July 2019
- #REDIRECT [[Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc - Case Note]]68 bytes (10 words) - 10:12, 4 April 2018
- #redirect[[Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc - Case Note]]67 bytes (10 words) - 13:19, 18 May 2016
- #redirect[[National Westminster Bank Ltd v Halesowen - Case Note]]66 bytes (10 words) - 10:08, 26 October 2018
- #redirect[[Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions - Case Note]]70 bytes (10 words) - 17:53, 27 April 2017
- #redirect[[Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions - Case Note]]70 bytes (10 words) - 17:46, 27 April 2017
- #redirect[[President of India v Lips Maritime Corporation - Case Note]]71 bytes (11 words) - 15:57, 9 January 2019
- ...rect[[Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation - Case Note]]86 bytes (12 words) - 16:38, 25 August 2017
- #REDIRECT [[President of India v Lips Maritime Corporation - Case Note]]72 bytes (11 words) - 15:56, 9 January 2019
- #REDIRECT [[Creating President of India v Lips Maritime Corporation - Case Note]]81 bytes (12 words) - 15:55, 9 January 2019
- #redirect[[Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd - Case Note]]81 bytes (14 words) - 11:57, 25 March 2020
- #redirect[[Concord Trust v The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc - Case Note]]80 bytes (13 words) - 13:59, 16 July 2019
- #redirect[[Concord Trust v The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc - Case Note]]80 bytes (13 words) - 18:42, 18 January 2017
- #REDIRECT [[Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Hing Bank - Case Note]]68 bytes (13 words) - 10:27, 28 June 2016
- ...ent]] [[for the time being]] (or {{sex|his or her}} [[Rex v Huggins - Case Note|dog]]).157 bytes (26 words) - 15:50, 24 April 2017
- ...ef> on the subject of a [[master]]’s liability for its [[beast]]s, in this case Rex, an elderly beagle with a bladder infection — an [[animal]] ''[[mansu689 bytes (112 words) - 16:26, 4 November 2016
- ...ger-beer you have sold them]], and those whose [[Rylands v Fletcher - Case Note|adjoining mineshafts are prone to flood should your reservoir leak]].1 KB (168 words) - 19:07, 21 July 2022
- *[[:Category:Case Note|Case notes]]729 bytes (107 words) - 13:02, 21 October 2022
- {{cn}}{{Cite|Goldsworthy|Brickell|[1987]|Ch|378}} is a case on the seldom talked-about topic of [[laches]]. {{c|Case Note}}612 bytes (99 words) - 19:07, 19 December 2020
- So if I am [[Fardell v Potts - Case Note|navigating my punt]] and I hit yours, and it sinks, then I have caused you ...reasonably anticipate might be affected by one’s [[Fardell v Potts - Case Note|careless punting]]), and2 KB (300 words) - 18:03, 30 March 2021
- ...fer]], [[acceptance]] and [[consideration]], [[Donoghue v Stevenson - Case Note|snails in gingerbeer]], [[constructive]] [[estoppel]] and [[laches]]?726 bytes (108 words) - 15:07, 3 May 2019
- ...’t be categorical about this, but this ''looks'' like Judge B. N. Cardozo. Note how his asymmetrical eyebrow curls given him a permanently wistful look, ra ...on law systems, having been cited no fewer that 66 times in recent English case law<ref>[https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/lucy_search_1.cgi?highlight=1&query1 KB (169 words) - 12:27, 12 March 2023
- {{cn}}The great case of {{cite|Hedley Byrne|Heller|1964|AC|465}}, known reverently to all studen Some irony, therefore, that in that particular case, the defendant was found ''not'' to have had a duty of care, since he had e1 KB (212 words) - 19:11, 19 December 2020
- ...[[Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited - Case Note|stupid]], application of the law of {{tag|contract}}.642 bytes (100 words) - 14:02, 16 October 2023
- ...re law of civil wrongs can be derived from a [[Donoghue v Stevenson - Case Note|rotten snail in a bottle of ginger-beer]], But the continentals will shrug855 bytes (135 words) - 11:02, 19 January 2020
- ...as a {{tag|floating charge}} — but don’t bank<ref>{{hawf}}</ref> on it and note that there are certain formal requirements to [[perfect]] a [[floating char ...he’s lost control]]</ref>, her [[fixed charge]] conceivably fail, in which case it would, most likely, be [[recharacterised]] as a [[floating charge]].3 KB (508 words) - 12:39, 5 January 2021
- ...shall]] not be [[obligated]] to breach, transgress or contravene, [[as the case may be]], any statue, law or regulation.” ...that in the [[Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc - Case Note|case note]] and in our article on section {{isdaprov|12 }} of the {{isdama}}4 KB (660 words) - 13:23, 9 February 2022
- ...ecause even though Jersey is in a currency union with sterling, the Jersey note is not legal tender in England. All true. And just so. In any case, you want to hand over something that is ''identical'' to, but isn’t exac4 KB (658 words) - 15:38, 27 May 2022
- All summed up very nicely in the case of {{casenote|Hadley|Baxendale}} where Baron Alderson said: ...ided for the breach of contract by special terms as to the damages in that case, and of this advantage it would be very unjust to deprive them.”4 KB (585 words) - 10:07, 5 September 2023
- ...is an important caveat — the programme limit inserted in an [[Medium term note|MTN programme]] is a mere bagatelle: an arbitrary number included only out ...ium term note]]<nowiki/>s might want some comfort that the issuer of that note will not go batshit crazy and rack up trillions of dollars in indebtedness4 KB (704 words) - 04:35, 2 April 2023
- ...h Trees House Ltd|1947|KB|13}} is [[Lord Denning]]’s famous [[High Trees]] case — though at the time he was not [[Lord Denning]], but mere [[Denning J]] ...ectly, was having ''none'' of this. Note that the actual action was a test case only seeking rent for periods in 1945, so technically the rent from 1940 wa3 KB (439 words) - 19:04, 19 December 2020
- Note that the prohibition on excluding or limiting liability for delegated oblig ...e of liability, be it regulatory or contractual, should be possible in the case of loss of assets by the {{ucits5prov|depositary}} or a third party to whic2 KB (395 words) - 11:19, 18 January 2020
- ...lder of a bearer note and/or registered owner of a registered note (as the case may, for the time being, be)” you have put your logic gate in the wrong p ...nd/or]] registered owner of a registered note ([[As the case may be|as the case may]], [[for the time being]], be)'' you can simplify the inherent logic of8 KB (1,363 words) - 17:00, 19 August 2022