Search results

Page title matches

• Rye v Rye - Case Note
  23 bytes (4 words) - 19:24, 19 December 2020
• Pioneer v TMT - Case Note
  27 bytes (4 words) - 19:18, 19 December 2020
• Enron v TXU
  ...ite|Enron Australia|TXU Electricity Ltd|2003|NSWSC|1169}} is a [[Straya]]n case focusing on the {{isdaprov|General Conditions}} clause of the {{isdama}}.
  1 KB (212 words) - 19:06, 19 December 2020
• The Moorcock - Case Note
  ===The case===
  3 KB (453 words) - 14:17, 29 September 2023
• Rex v Huggins - Case Note
  ...ef> on the subject of a [[master]]’s liability for its [[beast]]s, in this case Rex, an elderly beagle with a bladder infection — an [[animal]] ''[[mansu
  689 bytes (112 words) - 16:26, 4 November 2016
• SFO v ENRC - Case Note
  ...rect[[Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation - Case Note]]
  86 bytes (12 words) - 16:38, 25 August 2017
• Enron v TXU - Case Note
  25 bytes (4 words) - 19:06, 19 December 2020
• Re Spectrum Plus - Case Note
  30 bytes (4 words) - 19:22, 19 December 2020
• Re Spectrum Plus
  ...udgmt/jd050630/nat-1.htm click here for transcript].</ref> is an important case about [[fixed charge]]s and the [[doctrine of precedent]], that [[Golden th ...om Spectrum Plus’s point of view — fancy winning a landmark House of Lords case but — well, hard lines fellas. But [[Little old ladies make bad law|Littl
  11 KB (1,751 words) - 19:22, 19 December 2020
• Henderson v Merrett
  ...tp://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1994/5.html Judgment]</ref> is a leading case concerning [[concurrent liability]] in [[contract]] and [[tort]]. It concer
  4 KB (581 words) - 19:11, 19 December 2020
• Miller v Jackson - Case Note
  30 bytes (4 words) - 19:16, 19 December 2020
• Three Rivers No. 5
  ...n) would be covered by the general [[legal advice privilege]]. Per general case law, the starting proposition was no: information given by one employee to
  4 KB (569 words) - 19:29, 19 December 2020
• Barclays v Unicredit
  ...t might well not have been “commercially reasonable”. But that is not this case. The Court cited favourably the famous case of {{casenote|AP Picture Houses|Wednesbury}}.
  4 KB (711 words) - 19:03, 19 December 2020
• Donoghue v Stevenson - Case Note
  34 bytes (4 words) - 19:05, 19 December 2020
• Hadley v Baxendale - Case Note
  32 bytes (4 words) - 19:08, 19 December 2020
• Rylands v Fletcher - Case Note
  32 bytes (4 words) - 19:26, 19 December 2020
• Metavante v Lehman - Case Note
  32 bytes (4 words) - 19:16, 19 December 2020
• Thompson v Davenport
  ...t case of {{casenote|Heald|Kenworthy}}. Discussed at some length in the US case {{casenote|Poretta|Superior Dowel Company}} (transcript [http://law.justia.
  577 bytes (85 words) - 19:28, 19 December 2020
• Re Brown’s Estate - Case Note
  Anyway, enough of the historical context. This case is authority for the ancient principle that ''a [[loan]] of money on demand ...g bad bank, and defendant a [[Little old lady|little old lady - or in this case man]] — all the more so one who had recently popped clogs — so the mode
  2 KB (414 words) - 16:43, 7 November 2019
• Pioneer v Cosco - Case Note
  72 bytes (12 words) - 13:00, 18 August 2022

Page text matches

• Stein v Blake
  {{cn}}{{cite|Stein|Blake|1995|1AC|243}} is a key case on [[insolvency set-off]], affirming as it does 1972’s epochal {{casenote *[[National Westminster Bank Ltd v Halesowen - Case Note]]
  537 bytes (73 words) - 19:27, 19 December 2020
• No oral amendment
  ...d v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited - Case Note|Rock Advertising]]'' case===
  561 bytes (76 words) - 11:36, 21 March 2024
• Case law
  #redirect[[Category:Case Note]]
  31 bytes (4 words) - 17:42, 27 April 2017
• The Moorcock
  #REDIRECT [[The Moorcock - Case Note]]
  38 bytes (6 words) - 14:16, 29 September 2023
• Prospective overruling
  #redirect[[Re Spectrum Plus - Case Note]]
  41 bytes (7 words) - 10:43, 19 March 2018
• Enron Australia v TXU Electricity Ltd - Case Note
  #redirect[[Enron v TXU - Case Note]]
  36 bytes (7 words) - 08:44, 17 July 2019
• Metavante
  #redirect[[Metavante v Lehman - Case Note]]
  43 bytes (7 words) - 09:34, 28 January 2016
• Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No. 5) - Case Note
  #redirect[[Three Rivers No. 5 - Case Note]]
  43 bytes (7 words) - 10:36, 22 January 2018
• Three Rivers
  #redirect[[Three Rivers No. 5 - Case Note]]
  43 bytes (7 words) - 11:41, 22 January 2018
• Cavendish Square Holdings v El Makdessi - Case Note
  #redirect[[ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis - Case Note]]
  48 bytes (8 words) - 10:17, 18 April 2018
• Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd - Case Note
  #REDIRECT [[Henderson v Merrett - Case Note]]
  45 bytes (7 words) - 11:18, 1 July 2020
• RBS Rights Issue Litigation v - Case Note
  #REDIRECT [[RBS Rights Issue Litigation - Case Note]]
  53 bytes (8 words) - 16:38, 25 August 2017
• Hedley Byrne
  #redirect[[Hedley Byrne v Heller - Case Note]]
  46 bytes (8 words) - 15:30, 7 September 2016
• Marine Trade
  #REDIRECT [[Marine Trade v Pioneer - Case Note]]
  48 bytes (8 words) - 09:34, 28 January 2016
• Extended liens
  #redirect[[Re Lehman Brothers International - Case Note]]
  57 bytes (8 words) - 17:51, 18 January 2018
• Hammersmith and Fulham council
  #redirect[[Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC - Case Note]]
  60 bytes (10 words) - 08:46, 24 June 2019
• Firth Rixson
  #redirect[[Lomas v Firth Rixson - Case Note]]
  45 bytes (8 words) - 17:41, 26 April 2016
• National Westminster Bank Ltd v Halesowen Presswork & Assemblies Ltd - Case Note
  #redirect[[National Westminster Bank Ltd v Halesowen - Case Note]]
  66 bytes (10 words) - 10:08, 26 October 2018
• Wednesbury
  #redirect[[AP Picture Houses v Wednesbury - Case Note]]
  55 bytes (9 words) - 14:27, 16 July 2019
• Welsh hoteliers
  #REDIRECT [[Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc - Case Note]]
  68 bytes (10 words) - 10:12, 4 April 2018