Search results

:—''{{author|Arthur C. Clarke}}’s third law'' <br>

...cognise this, of course, as a simple extrapolation from {{author|Arthur C. Clarke}}’s more famous ''third'' law: “Any sufficiently advanced [[technology]

Exactly the kind of conjuring trick {{author|Arthur C. Clarke}} warned us would be hard to tell from technology.

...iently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic” says Arthur C. Clarke — the jury is out whether AI is different, but it is not unreasonable to

Machines are more like {{author|Arthur C. Clarke}}’s sentinels, watching dissociatively. They purport to describe the worl

...the folly of using magic to take shortcuts. If we take {{author|Arthur C. Clarke}} at his word that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishabl

But state-of-the-art machines, per Arthur C. Clarke, aren’t magic: it just ''seems'' like it, sometimes. They are a two-dimen ...ophomore mashups we don’t need.<ref>We would do well to remember Arthur C. Clarke’s law here. The parallel processing power an LLM requires is already mass