Search results

As used in this {{isda92prov|Agreement}}:— <br> {{ISDA Master Agreement 1992 Additional Termination Event Definition}}

{{ISDA Master Agreement 1992 Defaulting Party}} {{ISDA Master Agreement 1992 Non-defaulting Party}}

{{anat|isda}} :{{isdaprov|1(c)}} {{isdaprov|Single Agreement}}

:{{isdaprov|1(c)}} {{isdaprov|Single Agreement}} :{{isdaprov|2(e)}} {{isdaprov|Default Interest}} ([[1992 ISDA Master]] only)

...ricans now seem to acknowledge, ''improves'' the process of closing out an ISDA. ...e the 1992, so here we are. (Changed your mind? Flee to safety [[6(e)(i) - ISDA Provision|''here'']]).

...ricans now seem to acknowledge, ''improves'' the process of closing out an ISDA. (Want to see how awful the 1992 is? Go [[6(e)(i) - 1992 ISDA Provision|''here'']]).

What is the big deal about this, then? Well, it turns your ISDA into a “flawed asset”. ...g Party}} goes insolvent or fails to perform, the {{{{{1}}}|Non-defaulting Party}} is entitled to suspend the performance of its obligations without termina

“No [[NOM]] or [[Entire agreement|EA]]. It’s susceptible to a D.E.A.A., sir. ” “Denial of [[Entire agreement|Entire Agreement]] attack, sir.”