Search results

{{repprov|Principal}} <br> {{repprov|Non-reliance}} <br>

...{{tag|contract}}, and not a term of a contract in its own right, a broken representation entitles one to set aside the contract altogether as a failure of [[offer a ...going authority to bind its [[principal]] gladdens a broker’s heart. A full-throated assertion of its own regulatory authorisation; its continued [[good

{{a|negotiation|}}The [[Cross-Product Master Agreement]] of February 2000 is a [[master netting agreement] *[[Media:Cross-Product Master Agreement (CPMA) (2000).pdf|CPMA Document]]

...Trading Commission]] (“'''{{tag|CFTC}}'''”) and are not deemed illegal off-exchange transactions. ...d <br>all other goods and articles, except onions as provided in section 13-1 of this title, and all services, rights, and <br>interests in which contra

...e a privately-educated, Oxbridge-graduated north-London accent saying “pear-shaped” and “crack on” if you please.</ref>}} ...f any commercial arrangement are generally few, easily articulated and well-suited to the clipped, tabular timbre of a [[termsheet]]. There they can be

...}} addresses a perfect storm of unexpected factors to come to quite the eye-catching — well, eye-''watering'', at any rate — conclusion. ...g agent|adminstrative agent]], accidentally paid half a billion dollars of principal to lenders when it only meant to pay $8m of interest, was told that due to

===[[Close-out]] method=== The {{2002ma}}, with its {{isdaprov|Close-Out Amount}}, is way simpler than the {{1992ma}} which gets bogged down with

:{{isda87prov|3(a)(ix)}} '''{{isda87prov|Payer Tax Representation}}'''. Each representation specified in Part 2 of the {{isda87prov|Schedule}} as being made by it for :{{isda87prov|3(a)(x)}} '''{{isda87prov|Payee Tax Representations}}'''. Each representation specified in Part 2 of the {{isda87prov|Schedule}} as being made by it for