Tonewood

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 10:51, 17 August 2024 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Crime & Punishment
A nice piece of tonewood yesterday. Alder, since you are asking.
Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Queen: Hark: a clammy ditch. How deep!

Nuncle: And yet with our temper’d syllogies
We dig it deeper by the minute.

Queen: And behold: fair Triago —

Nuncle: Of open’d mouth and mind,
Well-endowed to drop right in it.

Enter Triago popping his head out of the ditch muttering to himself

Triago: Who wouldst die, wouldst die therein about it?

Queen: How now, Triago?
How fares thy latest batty postulation?

Triago: Most promising, Majesty.
I have it ratified that wren’s eggs,
Broken thus, betray yet unacknowledged villainy.

Queen: How so, Professor?

Triago: Experimental rigour, Ma’am. Nothing less:
A hundred men, detained at your pleasure, were took
And each one bid to strike an egg against a pan.
Every wren’s egg broke. The lot. Not one exception!

Nuncle: Pray, give me air!

Queen: What provenance the eggs?

Triago: I bid each man poach one from the mother’s nest:
Insurance that their hearts were indubitably black.

Queen: Poor Mrs. Wren must be furious!

Nuncle: Not quite so wild as is this correlation spurious.

Triago: Ho, Ho.
Let not thy witty fool, nor his foolish wit
Besmirch the fruited science of th’ academy.
“A little learning is a dangerous thing” —

Nuncle: Yet not half so dangerous as a lot.

Triago: — So sayeth Pope, you know.

Nuncle: But not the one in Rome:

Queen: Good ser knight: art thou drunk upon the Pierian spring:
A hypoxic draft that suffocates the brain,
So deep no shaft of light can bring it round again?

Triago: My conjecture comports a grain of truth
As pure and true and golden—

Nuncle: — but yet no more roundly causative
Than are the month-past flappings of a Latin papillon
Upon a brewing Filipino typhoon.

Triago: (aside) Yet am I here caught, a spider’s prey
Wrestling ’gainst the sticky silk
And by mine own dim efforts
Binding e’er further to my criminous fate.
In this sinking oubliette of mine devise
Am I enchain’d: alack! There is no gate.

Otto Büchstein, Die Schweizer Heulsuse

A decades-long debate rages amongst electric guitar nuts about how the material from which an electric guitar is made affects its tone. There are similar debates about hi-fi componentry, real ale, assay tests for the presence of exogenous insulin but JC happens to know more about it than those other things, so it will serve as an example. It runs like this:

For :

The precise shape, size and composition of an electric guitar’s body meaningfully affects the guitar’s tone. The sound will change depending on whether the body is made of ash, alder, basswood, pau ferro, chipboard or perspex and even the grain and density of the wood will affect its harmonic resonance.

Against:

Bullshit.

There will then follow a long detailed and increasingly hostile flame war — sometimes multi-handed but usually reducing to two core combatants as it descends further into the unfathomable depths of the Perian spring, where jousters will debate the merits of the climactic sonsiderations, the fibrous character of different woods, the effect over time of electric currents and aluminium-nickle-cobalt alloys (from which pickups are built) on the moisture content, and even the resonant frequencies of different types of varnish.

Now: all stringed instruments rely on the vibration of a string anchored between fixed points. The string’s vibration will indeed depend on the sympathetic vibration of the materials it is constructed from. There will be some sympathetic vibration of any material.

But these vibrations are as the wings of a butterfly in an Amazon forest compared with the other things affecting the tone of a struck electric guitar string. These include (you needn’t read this;it is included to make a point:

How important tonewood is in the grand scheme of things
Factor Considerations
The player
  • How hard she strikes the strings
  • With what (pick or fingers; what type of pick?)
  • Right hand dampening
  • Left hand vibrato
Instrument
  • Fixed or floating bridge.
  • Glued or bolted neck
  • Nut composition
  • Bridge composition
  • String gauge
  • String age
Electronics
  • Potentiometers
  • Capacitors
  • Resistors
  • Pickups: Single-coil/P90/humbucking[1]
  • Cavity shielding
  • Length of cable to the amplifier.
Stomp-boxes
  • Distortion
  • Compression
  • Modulation
  • Delay
  • Reverb
  • Equalisation
Amplification
  • Type: Tube/transisitor/digitial
  • Class: Class A/B/A-B
  • Power: 15w-100w
  • Preamp settings
  • Power amp settings
  • Tone settings
Speaker cabinet
  • Open or closed back
  • Speaker size
  • Speaker configuration
Public address system
  • Mixing
  • Foldback
  • Volume
The rest of the band
  • What instruments
  • What they play
  • How loud they play
  • Where they are relative to the guitar
The room
  • Size
  • Acoustic properties
  • Natural reverberation
  • How many people are in it
  • Ambient noise


See also

  1. for the love of all that is holy let us not get onto the topic of polepiece construction and ageing of copper wire.