Hedley Byrne v Heller: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The great case establishing the principle that one might be liable in {{tag|tort}} for negligent misstatement. Some irony, therefore, that in that particular case, the d...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 15:28, 7 September 2016
The great case establishing the principle that one might be liable in tort for negligent misstatement.
Some irony, therefore, that in that particular case, the defendant was found not to have had a duty of care, since he had effectively disclaimed one.