Template:Agencydisclosurescenarios: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
*'''[[Undisclosed principal]]''': [[Principal]] has appointed [[agent]], [[agent]] has disclosed [[agency]], [[agent]] has '''not''' [[undisclosed principal|disclosed principal]].
*'''[[Undisclosed principal]]''': [[Principal]] has appointed [[agent]], [[agent]] has disclosed [[agency]], [[agent]] has '''not''' [[undisclosed principal|disclosed principal]].
*'''[[Undisclosed agent|Undisclosed agency]]''': [[Principal]] has appointed [[agent]], [[agent]] has '''not''' disclosed [[agency]], [[agent]] has '''not''' [[undisclosed principal|disclosed principal]].
*'''[[Undisclosed agent|Undisclosed agency]]''': [[Principal]] has appointed [[agent]], [[agent]] has '''not''' disclosed [[agency]], [[agent]] has '''not''' [[undisclosed principal|disclosed principal]].
*'''[[Full principal|Principal]]''': [[Principal]] has '''not''' appointed [[agent]], [[agent]] has '''not''' disclosed [[agency]], [[agent]] has '''not''' disclosed principal. (Here, an entity subsequently alleging it is an [[agent]] is basically being [[fraud]]ulent).
*'''[[Principal|Full principal]]''': [[Principal]] has '''not''' appointed [[agent]], [[agent]] has '''not''' disclosed [[agency]], [[agent]] has '''not''' disclosed principal. (Here, an entity subsequently alleging it is an [[agent]] is basically being [[fraud]]ulent).

Revision as of 10:47, 28 September 2016

Possible scenarios

Here are the possible “undisclosed agency” scenarios at the time of contract: